this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1163 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
653 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

Copenhagen pretty much has this. So easy to get around everywhere.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

somebody should do a compilation including data about:

  • the costs of public transport against private cars, for the whole city
  • the space consumption for parking your private cars in a city compared to the space consumption for all public transport vehicles

and make a statistics and post it here

[–] Bashnagdul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They have (I've seen them, but don't have a link sorry) and car free or semi car free with good bike and public infrastructure is almost always cheaper and more efficient

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 80 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I've been saying for years "self driving cars are solving the wrong problem". The problem isn't that I have to steer my car. The problem is I need a fucking car to go anywhere worth going.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or even

Wait for it

SELF DRIVING TRANSIT

Which yes is already a thing too

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Okay

but what, hear me out now.

What if we just got a bunch of self driving cars.

and we linked them together to increase capacities.

and had them run on a dedicated path

and create special locations where these car links come and go on a regular schedule, so people can get on and off predictably?

It'll be new, neverbefore seen, and revolutionary! /s

And much easier to implement than self driving cars

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm hearing you want continental Europe

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New York City, Washington DC, Boston, MA?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SD, LA, SF, Sacramento, Portland, Seattle, Vancouver

Please.

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m realizing these cities were founded in colonial times by Europeans

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

.... yes? not sure what that has to do with high speed rail but you're not wrong.

* exceptions may apply

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Shame that they don't want me. ;_;

[–] Yupa@ani.social 3 points 1 day ago

*western continental Europe

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (28 children)

I saw a video recently by a car enthusiast who hates the idea of self driving cars for a novel reason.

Even if self-driving cars are safer than people it won’t stop bad owners. People who drive with unsafe mechanical issues they can’t or won’t get fixed are still going to exist, and bald tires and worn brakes would eliminate any potential safety benefits of self driving.

And by further removing people from the operation of a car, you’re making them worse owners. They won’t know what a worn tie rod bushing would feel like because they never steer. Making cars into appliances just makes them less safe.

He also made a point that I agree with: If we get people who don’t want to drive off the road, the roads would be nicer for people who do want to drive.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People who drive with unsafe mechanical issues they can’t or won’t get fixed are still going to exist, and bald tires and worn brakes would eliminate any potential safety benefits of self driving.

In European nations we just inspect the shit out of every car to ensure safety. The car must be mechanically satisfactory and have adequate brakes, tyres, etc.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

In the US only 19 states have mandatory periodic safety inspections

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Back when I used to agree with Mush, he said something I still agree with, "you don't want flying cars, because you don't want a poorly maintained car to fly around and lose a hubcap".

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So many times watching a car crash video, someone hydroplanes through a puddle …. my first reaction is I bet they live somewhere without safety inspections and those tires are bald

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

*and affordable. The trains by me are barely affordable, so I will only take them if absolutely necessary. It would be amazing if it was cheap enough that I could just pick a place to go and explore without needing a reason.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Free at point of service. No more of this regressive individual riders pay nonsense.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Metype@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah, public transit so common and part of day-to-day it's unremarkable and boring.

load more comments
view more: next ›