this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
205 points (99.5% liked)

News

31365 readers
2913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump on Friday called for the firing of the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported.

Trump in a post on his social media platform alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired.

Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from 125,000, and in June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%.

While the jobs numbers are often the subject of political spin, economists and Wall Street investors — with millions of dollars at stake — have always accepted U.S. government economic data as free from political manipulation.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 59 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So is the official policy going forward to lie about the economy?

Is there going to be any backlash against this?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 31 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So is the official policy going forward to lie ~~about the economy~~?

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Fair enough.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Some pennies are going to be upset, but most of the money will be fine.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 41 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that make the jobs data even worse?

[–] commander@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

It would but Trump right now is Erdogan-lite when it comes to control over all the different government departments and agencies and putting out bad data to try to make their policies not look so terrible in practice.

Why this will ultimately fail. There are many huge financial corporations in the world where a major part of their ability to be successful is having accurate data. More accurate data than their competitors so they employ their own data collection and analysis teams and don't fully rely on governments and other corporations to be truthful

Then companies that want investment/loans go to these big finance/banking companies and these finance companies have their own data on companies that want a loan or they'll require these potential debtors provide a look into their books and the bank will want accurate data.

If the potential debtors gives bad data, are all the retailers, shipping companies, packaging companies, etc all providing bad data. If the states labor department is underreporting unemployment, are the public benefits departments reporting bad data? How about independent non-profit food banks and other community organizations.

Every countries government in the world would want accurate data from countries and companies around the world too so they can develop policy with good data in mind with a mind for how global trade activity may be heading towards

Trying to lie about finance and labor statistics at the major corporation and national government level in the modern world is stupid

[–] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 17 hours ago

I appreciate the thoughtful analysis, but I was just making a dumb joke that firing two people would make unemployment worse, not better, because there are two more unemployed people...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

And if the president is openly manipulating the data everyone who needs that data to be right will avoid government data.

[–] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 28 points 20 hours ago

Well it's certainly unlikely to continue to be free from bias.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Firing the guy handing you the data isn't gonna make the data suddenly different, Dumbass Donald.

[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 17 hours ago

THE FIRINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL EMPLOYMENT NUMBERS IMPROVE! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 17 hours ago

This is they guy who wanted to make covid numbers better by stopping testing, and he has only grown more senile since then...

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 16 points 20 hours ago

I didn’t even need a report. I was assuming, from the fact that LinkedIn stopped sending me suggestions of jobs to apply for, and now sends notifications of jobs that were filled, that I guess I missed out on (?🤷‍♂️). I can’t explain the logic behind their decision to do this, but I assumed it had something to do with a scarcity of open job opportunities.

[–] jason@discuss.online 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Now, if employment does a 180 in August, he's going to have a real hard time selling it. What an incompetent loon.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I remember when BLS way overshot ADP numbers (that showed her loss) and thought it was weird at the time. Guess ADP was closer to right