this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
257 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
3648 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blobchoice@feddit.uk 25 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I'll just copy and paste what I wrote elsewhere

I have to say since this whole anti porn in games thing has happened, I've ironically exposed myself to more porn games.

Before I wouldn't imagine playing porn games. Ever since the itch unban, I've tried a few games on itch.io to see what the fuss was about and got absolutely hooked on Queens Brothel - to the point where I've paid for the full version on Patreon.

If the Christian brothers and sisters at Collective Shout wanted less people exposed to porn games, lol. lmao even.

[–] Rawrosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago

I had no clue these games even existed until this whole thing. Now I've seen far more porn games than I ever expected to be a thing.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago

Streisand effect

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So if the problem is payment, what stops a company from selling "tokens" and those tokens can be redeemed for "anything"?

That way the visa / mastercard assholes can suck a cock, no?

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

It would likely be the same in the eyes of the payment processor. It technically is the same thing, except you must "top up" your account with money first before buying a game, instead of buying it directly.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Add some massive unregulated grifting and hideous environmental consequences to your idea, and you've just invented Bitcoin.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The whole crypto scene seems like a scheme at the moment... But then you see the bullshit visa / mastercard are pulling and you see the need for a digital currency.

Any corporation with near monopoly power will ALWAYS fuck up the consumer.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Crypto, in my view is more conceded with libertarianism than actually helping anyone. I read the grievances as capitalism not providing enough opportunity to be the boot.

Even still crypo is centralized as that is how most people interact with it. The speculative nature also makes it a bad currency.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago
[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If they make it free but adapt some content lock for further progress, which you can get by donating to dev? It would not be too bad, be better for the dev as no cut is taken by itch

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So... Who processes the donation?

[–] Apathy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Any ethical website that is already a donation handler for content creators?

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The problem is the payment processor. There's only so many of them that customers actually choose to use.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Heard about this earlier. The situation sucks, but at least this is better than nothing.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So devs got to eat it because this company can't stand up to Mastercard and Visa.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

A payment processor tells that they either remove the porn games, or they will remove the ability to pay for all games for them. The only company that can stand up to them in any way is one large enough to call the bluff and the payment processor wouldn't be willing to actually lose.

And that list is basically Amazon, Apple, Google and stuff like that, and definitely not a tiny thing like itch.io.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Valve stands a better chance of making a stand, but it's still a single sandbag vs a tsunami

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Valve was the first to fold. And apparently it wasn't to Visa or Mastercard but to some intermediaries. Not sure how much pull those have, but probably still pretty big given what happened.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, Valve folded first, but with itch pushing back a little it gives me hope that Valve will do the same, but with a little more teeth.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Itch.io is currently saying the problem is Stripe, and maybe Visa.

Historically (ex: https://otakuusamagazine.com/visa-and-mastercard-refuse-to-work-with-another-doujinshi-retailer/), I'd say Mastercard and Visa are both to blame. But the jury is still out on wtf is going on here.

I'm not sure who pressured Steam. But Itch.io (https://aftermath.site/steam-itch-porn-censorship-collective-shout-visa-mastercard-paypal) is claiming Stripe and Visa are pressuring them.

(Speaking with Aftermath, Itch's founder, Leaf Corcoran, specifically cited a notice from Visa as an incident that led to the sudden deindexing of so many games).