this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
229 points (95.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

36337 readers
917 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PS DefenSe in the us.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 13 hours ago

funny how the israeli military is called a "defense force". haven't been doing much defending.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Old joke from when I was in engineering college.

What's the difference between a electrical engineer and a civil engineer?

One builds the bombs one builds the targets.

[–] SeraphimNova@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

The attack industry

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 11 hours ago

Well I mean yeah. "Defense" just sounds better on TV.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a fairly recent development. It was created as the department of war by Washington and remained that until 1947 where it split into the departments of the air force and army, joining the already existing department of the navy, which together made up the national military establishment (NME), which was renamed 2 years later to the DOD.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 23 hours ago

Oddly enough, this also coincides with the time when the US military was more explicitly about offence rather than defense. After the Revolution, people mistrusted the federal government having a large standing army. The army was raised up in time of war, and everyone went home when it was over.

Post-WW2 was the first time the US kept a large army in "peace". Been that way ever since.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Military-industrial complex
  • War machine
  • Merchants of death

There are many names.

[–] blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk 2 points 11 hours ago

A way of keeping people employed usefully in many highly skilled jobs so you don't need to give them social security payouts for being jobless. In this way it is a truly excellent idea.

[–] Sergio@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago

"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the War Room!"

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Regardless of what you call it, making the production of weapons an 'industry' is psychotic.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

let's look at how well it worked out when a country turned over it's nuclear weapons and relied on treaties to keep it safe.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Defense does also do defense in a lot of cases

[–] fujiwood@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago

"The Ministry of Peace"

-Orwell

[–] teft@piefed.social 17 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The US used to have the Department of War. Then it split up after WWII into the departments of the army, navy, air force and the overseeing department was renamed the department of defense. Probably a branding thing.

edit: a word

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

WWII was the war to end all wars, so we couldn't have a department of war anymore. Still "needed" and army , navy, marines and all the weapons for them though so we created the department of defense.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve always heard to it referred to as the “military industrial complex”. Eisenhower tried to warn us about it in the 1950s.

[–] teft@piefed.social 7 points 21 hours ago

Smedley Butler was warning us in 1935. War is a Racket .

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 8 points 22 hours ago

For countries like Finland, the Ministry of Defense is not about offense, and is very heavily armed.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They also cause Famines, Plagues, and Pestilence. They have whole departments devoted to nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.

They're not a one trick pony.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 23 hours ago

It was the department of war but the government decided that that name was too honest, makes the corpos look bad too

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 6 points 23 hours ago

Protecting your own country doesn't always involve actively declaring war with everyone. Often it's economic or cyber infrastructure hardening related

[–] troed@fedia.io 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah ... no.

Ask Europeans if they feel working in that industry right now feels like anything but for defensive reasons.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Indeedy, my wife works for the German army.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Gentlemen! There will be no fighting in the War Room!

[–] npdean@lemmy.today -3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It is a war industry for the Western countries because the war is never on their soil. It is a defence industry for everyone else.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

yeah russia sure is defending the shit out of itself invading ukraine.

I get it, western countries bad, but for fucks sake have a bit of perspective.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

NATO expansionism is the root cause of this war. NATO instigated this war and Russia got baited.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 9 hours ago

I'll bite. In the 5 years leading up to Russia invading Ukraine, what did NATO do that warrants such a move by Russia?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

ROFLS you really believe that huh?

even after russia guaranteed ukraine's security in the budapest memorandum?

wow. amazing.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today -3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The US invaded Ukraine?

Sorry, that didn't happen.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, but they did promise protection. So far, there has been no protection given, only money.

Problem with talking about USA in this conflict is everytime immediately assumes that anyone accusing USA of anything is automatically supporting Russia.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So far, there has been no protection given

just tons and tons of ordinance, from the javelins that stopped the taking of Kiev to the artillery, apcs, aircraft and munitions for everything from autocannons to patriots, yeah, no protection whatsoever.

problem with talking about USA in this conflict are the spineless fucks who keep undermining our support to appease PUTIN. Ukraine deserves more, but we're stymied by the kompromised members of our government.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

That's my whole point, only money has been given. US troops should have been deployed to Ukraine.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The war is never on their soil? WW1 and 2 and Yugoslavia ring a bell? And Ukraine is a western country too.

They predict that Russia will attack western Europe in 2027, by the way.

[–] npdean@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

We are talking about the war/defence industry which is a much newer thing when countries started selling weapons and such to other countries on a large scale and during their own non-war times, like the last 50 years of American history. If countries sold weapons to each other during WW2, it was because they were involved in the war themselves. Nowadays, it is just selling weapons and watching others burn each other down.

Predictions have been going on since forever about so many things. Doesn't make it any truer. China is going to annex Taiwan, Russia is going to attack Europe, Iran is weeks away from nukes. Funnily, there are no predictions about USA doing stuff.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Then it's not really on topic...

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago
[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Someone who works in said US defense industry here

Neither defense nor war really apply to what we do, but between the two defense is the more apt description. The DoD largely uses a strategy of deterrence, where the technology we develop and training done for the "war fighter" is just public and visible enough that no other major country wants to take the risk of going into full open conflict with the US. Since most efforts go into deterrence, and deterrence is a defense strategy, it does become the more appropriate word.

Sure the US loves its proxy wars, but those don't throw the entire nation into wartime. Plus, in a round about way proxy wars help with the deterrence since we get an outlet for the decades old stock piles of arms that we no longer want and want to replace with the new stuff. If our waste products are being useful in places like Ukraine, it helps build up an idea of what it is we keep for ourselves, again building up a deterrence of openly and directly attacking the US

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sure the US loves its proxy wars, but those don’t throw the entire nation into wartime.

because keeping the wars 'over there' and impacts from said conflicts minimal on the populace (no drafts, no rationing, no sacrifices) makes it easy to send the youth to be blown up in far off places.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

What I was referencing by proxy war was Ukraine and what Israel was supposed to be. The US sends arms to another nation with the intention that the other nation, who is already in conflict (or just happens to be through dubious and convenient circumstances) will take those arms and give political adversaries a bloody nose or serve as enough of a distraction that they won't come after the US and keeps the US from putting boots on the ground. Is working out quite well for us in Ukraine, Israel was supposed to distract the middle east but turns out that when you hand a genocidal maniac a bunch of weapons, he's gonna do maniacal genocidal things with them. Who could have possibly guessed