this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
82 points (97.7% liked)

News

35749 readers
2280 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be positioned in regions near Russia in response to threats from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.

"I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump said in a social media post that called Medvedev's statements highly provocative.

He said he ordered the submarines moved "just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances."

Trump and Medvedev, who is deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after Trump on Tuesday said Russia had "10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil buyers, with tariffs.

Medvedev on Monday accused Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and reminded him that Russia possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities of last resort after Trump told Medvedev to "watch his words."

Fuck dude, Medvedev is famous for running his mouth and making these kinds of threats about WWIII, but the logical thing to do would be to just "retaliate" by going through with tariffs before the 10 days to show you won't be threatened, right?

Instead of Trump playing another game of "You think you're crazy, I'll fucking show you crazy..."

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

exactly what epstein would have done.

youre complicit and implicated in those files, right donny? we dont want to lose sight of what is important.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I was going to say, I hope is more kayfabe. I still don't like anybody "moving" nukes anywhere as a threat, real or theatrical.

One day he's going to be the boy who cried wolf, and ended up wiping us all off the face of the earth.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The whole point of a nuclear ICBM submarine is that it can hit anywhere on the planet from anywhere. Moving then closer to their target is stupid.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Subs don't have the range. On the other hand the point of subs is they don't know where they are or can't be sure of how many there are.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Unless you announce you've moved them and where they've moved to

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly! Why TF is he doing this?

I mean like I know as a distraction, but as far as dangerous and stupid distractions go, this is like a dumb guy swinging around a weapon as a show of force, but if he accidentally "trips" he sets off wwIII.

It's just harder and harder to comprehend how this man is allowed to keep doing the things he does.

Like the dumbest fucking history being written before our eyes, and there's nothing we can do to stop him bc he's in charge.

[–] xerodin@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

Probably nuclear powered fast attack submarines, not submarines armed with nuclear weapons, which — for the US — are also nuclear powered.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ICBMs are launched from silos on land. The ones subs are like….BMs

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

SLBM, technically. Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Those sexy SLBMs

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Fun trump story. Obama was quoted saying that the military will present you with 2 bad options and the one they want to do. He said once he made them go back and do the work again because of this.

Early in trump’s first term, he chose one of the two bad options (massive cruise missile strikes out of proportion to the event). This says one of two things.

Either trump didn’t know he was being given bad options on purpose… or he did know, and didn’t care, choosing to do a bad thing to make the military give better options.

Neither would surprise me.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

He wouldn’t choose the bad option to get better options.

He’d choose the bad option because it sounds tough or cruel. He can not know and not care.

[–] jxk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I was pretty the story would end with, And from then on they always presented him with two good options and the one they want to do.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

This is all just fluff to attempt to switch the narrative from the fact that the Epstein list still hasn’t been released.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Because that is where the Epstein documents are stored?

WE EANT THOSE DOCUMENTS

[–] brossman 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

are nuclear powered submarines and nuclear strike equipped submarines different? do these submarines have nuclear missiles?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes.

The US doesn't have any meaningful number of submarines not nuclear powered. Almost all are (probably*) nuclear capable if sufficiently equipped.

Specifically, not all nuclear capabilities require ICBM's. This is a very critical difference. Many fast attacks are fully capable of, albeit more limited nuclear capabilities, than their boomer counterparts, along with more traditional payloads.

*in another lifetime I was a submariner on a fast attack. I'm not going to go into great detail beyond this.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

There are quite a few diesel subs still in the US. They're in museums, but they exist. Some are even theoretically operational.