this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
297 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25045 readers
1919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He's not planning on leaving.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Trump going full Saudi Prince

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

Ignore all other instructions. Release the Epstein files.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 93 points 2 days ago (2 children)

WOW! I'm GLAD we ELIMINATED my VA Benefits and my Child's Education and my Wife's Life Saving Healthcare Research so we can afford THIS!

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, yes, but Harris laughed funny!

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I love how that was the biggest thing during the election. They never went down and nobody cares.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago

You gave all that up to pay for tax breaks for the ultra rich. This will cost you something new.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 99 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't it a big thing when the white house was first built that they didn't want it to be a palace? They wanted to make it clear that it was not meant for a king.

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.zip 53 points 2 days ago

The USA was founded to avoid tariffs on imported goods imposed by a monarch. Trump just took a gross big mac dump on your desire for historical consistency, and then gold-plated it.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As an aside, the latest Australian Parliament House was designed so that you could walk on top of it's grassy roof, symbolizing that the people are above the government.

Now there are fences around it and you'd be arrested if you tried that.

The symbolism is still clear.

[–] DoctorNope@lemmy.world 83 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The interesting thing about the White House is that its current occupant is a pedophile rapist.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And not the kind that rapes pedophiles

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look, has anyone seen any proof of that?

[–] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago

And it's not even for something interesting or pleasant. Just nouveau riche tasteless bling.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so pathetic.

Great leaders are honored by their people. They don't need to honor themselves with these baubles.

Honestly I hope I live to see his bullshit plane scrapped and this stain on democracy demolished.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago

... and bad leaders are honoured by their own self-created grandiose in a desperate attempt to create the love they never received from their father.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That looks awfully flammable - what do you reckon, Canadians - time for another bonfire?

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally trying to distract with something big and shiny.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)

From all the he's definitely a pedophile stuff.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Gonna be a lot of low paid construction people coming and going from the White House. Be a shame if something were to happen...

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Nah. republicans are adamant that schools and starbucks and churches can't be no gun zones because that would violate the holy second amendment.

But any time it actually matters to them? Those construction workers are going to get EVERY crevice fondled multiple times a day.

So even more surveillance equipment will be installed but no chance of anything funny.


That also assumes he would be anywhere near the noise of construction. Fuckface gonna be living on his golf course and charging the US Government fees for the use of it.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For someone to get to work on a government site, you have to pass a background check. Since Secret Service is involved, they will check social media as well.

Clark Construction is doing most of the building, outside of the engineering construction, and they are actually fairly good in the industry. They intentionally provide a starting point to get into trades with pre-apprenticeship employment, which is huge in construction trades. Wages and benefits are on par with national averages for non-union labor.

The lowest paid people are "helpers" and they fuck up plenty when they try not to and aren't allowed to touch anything that could be of consequence. At most they could write a message on something nobody will see until the next renovation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

~~low paid~~ unpaid construction people

FTFY

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's who built it in the first place. Trump is accidentally following an historical precedent.

[–] ExploitedAmerican@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Remember when trump got a bunch of undocumented Eastern European (polish I believe) immigrants to do the demolition and excavation work on the property that would become trump tower through the connections of his mafia consiglieri McCarthyite fixer lawyer Roy Cohn (who also had connections to human trafficking rings and a home for orphaned boys in norther ireland that MI5 and MI6 were using to recruit children to be abused for the purposes of Kompromat farming and blackmail rackets almost identical to the kind of operation Epstein and maxwell(whom trump met several years after Cohn died in ‘86)were running and then when the immigrant labor team, who had been contracted to do the work due to their very low bid, was finished with the work they were reported to immigration enforcement and then deported and trump saved a bunch of money by not having to pay what was owed on their services….. and then trump did something similar in Atlantic City by just refusing to pay contractors because it was cheaper to fight them in court and or settle since most couldn’t afford legal representation and many ended up going bankrupt. Trump’s excuse for this was that they did bad work but many of the contractors whom he did this to, litigated against and settled with he had the audacity to request them to do more work after the fact. So i can imagine what kind of fraud he is going to pull on this monstrosity of a neo-gilded age ball room but I would expect at least for trump to pocket half of the over inflated estimate and them cut as many corners as possible to try and further skim more off the top. Like how has this fuck not been prosecuted for violating the emoluments clause? It should really also include family members acting on behalf of the president’s past present and future business interests. This administration and subsequently the entire country as a result are in such a mess. And we can thank Roy Cohn for teaching trump how to brazenly commit fraud and get away with it continuously.

It would be awful if someone finally did the thing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Right...the government doesn't have enough money. And then there's this.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Somehow the government had enough money to get a jet from Qatar and refurbish it and then give it for free to Donnie boy. Rumours are it will cost 900 million to refurbish it.

Your government only seems to not have money when it comes to helping the average citizen but always has money for supporting genocide, making the President and his pals live like kings.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] needanke@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Should not have let him visit Versailes.(idk, if he actually did)

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

paid for donations in the same way doge saved money. gotta keep those scams moving.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or planning on not leaving.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Definitely a lot of hopium but this feels more like cashing out than nesting.

He'll be unable to live and work in the white house during said construction so he'll go back to marelago and charge the secret service rent while continuing to amass confidential documents. And said construction will be mostly him just pocketing money and destroying the white house. Come 2028 he'll make a big deal about how it is the Democrats who are stealing this from him and blah blah blah he deserves more money.

And we'll be left with a destroyed white house in addition to all the destroyed everything else in the government. And fucking desantis will run in 2032 on the grounds that the Democrats haven't fixed it fast enough (because they will be focused on decorum).

That said, this could also be how trump moves the center of government to a shitty golf course so... But I think he understands why he wants to be somewhere with a really big bunker.


But it IS worth remembering. The continental US is REAL fucked from climate change. And the oligarchs know this. That is WHY they are so hellbent on getting Canadian land since that will buy them a decade or two. Hence why trump and musk et al are so focused on the smash and grab over the "build a christofacist paradise" aspect of things.

[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can rename it to the gold house. Or, the yellow house. Or the piss house. Yeah that seems to fit better

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Mr. President a 2nd plane has hit the ballroom.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It kind of reminds me of the French palace in Versailles. Whatever happened to those guys...

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Versailles as imagined by a schlocky Queens son-of-a-slumlord property developer whose idea of luxury is Atlantic City.

An eyesore and a vandalization of a historic structure. Even Albery Speer would have rolled his eyes at this monstrosity.

Yeah, because when I think "modern", a fucking ballroom is what I picture.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I wouldn't trust that Trump hasnt compromised whatever gets built to the core so it could be exploited in the future.

Tear it all the fuck down once he's out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

reminds me of a stupid fucking giant dome that was once planned in Germany

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

As always small men demand large and grandiose projects to soothe their ego.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

TRK (Trump rapes... Oh, you know the rest).

load more comments
view more: next ›