I empathize with the developers because unannounced interruptions to their revenue streams are not good. I don't know why itch made the initial decision to implement their changes the way they did, but my guess is they got a series of strongly worded letters out of the blue from payment processors and were given a timeline of "IMMEDIATELY OR ELSE" and had to shut off the tap and adjust or risk their own ability to receive ANY payments.

Even if they handled it badly, which maybe they did, it's a better measure of a company/person in how they address mistakes or bad moves. They aren't perfect but they seem to be trying to address concerns and be transparent, at least as transparent as they feel they can be in an uncertain situation where they have to protect themselves legally and operate from a position where every official statement they make will be blown up by media. So they need to be very, very careful how they communicate to risk further damage.

Remember, itch IS NOT the bad guy here, it's the payment processors. Do not lose sight of that.

I can absolutely understand why people who have had their livelihoods disrupted are unhappy but I empathize with the position that itch is in and I care a lot more about how they course correct and manage fallout, even if they make bad decisions when faced with requirement to take immediate action (and I can't even say whether they did or not, nobody can, because nobody but them has the facts), than I care about whether they made a bad decision in the moment.

People, good people, fuck up all the time. How they manage the mistake matters more than the mistake itself.

If they keep doing the same shit over and over it's a different story.

PS: I have no dog in this fight except I think what the payment processors are doing is wrong, but it doesn't explicitly affect me at all. I'm also not particularly educated on this except for what I read in the news, I've never used itch at all. I just don't think payment processors should be in the business of casting moral judgments on legal transactions. IMO it should be ILLEGAL for them to deny services for LEGAL goods and services.

The issue isn't the amount of effort required to undo one action.

It is the complete lack of effort every other time this is done. Gamers Rise Up STILL pretend this is some watershed moment that nobody could have foreseen. And while it is always dangerous to consider The Internet to be a monolith, you can even see threads here where people didn't care when it was just "incest and furry shit" on Steam.

Let alone when it was basically the entirety of Pornhub a couple years back.

And that is the problem. This kind of shit happens. Why should a megacorp fight it when nobody will care one way or another and this avoids any bad press? Why should news outlets report on it when the outcome will be "Ugh, fucking scammer journalists. How fucking dare they put that behind a paywall or have ads"?

So they just kind of acquiesce to the loudest voice in the room until people DO care.

The lesson to take from this isn't that we need government intervention every single time chuds do anything.

The lesson should be to ACTUALLY support independent journalism that covers shit like this. At the very least, shut the fuck up when you see a paywall from a blog run by some of the most established and prestigious investigative journalists in the tech space. Preferably consider throwing a buck or two their way so they can pay for legal fees.

And... ACTUALLY support good smut (that aligns with your preferences, morals, etc). Everyone (except some of the aces) likes to get a bit frisky with themselves every so often. Rather than always just pirate that shit consider throwing a few bucks at creators (and games) that do it right. You'll find you get a LOT more of the stuff you like (see: The rise of "chick porn" in the late 00s/early 10s... and the overabundance of stepsister washing machine porn in the 20s...) AND it shows stores that there is actually a market for that and it might be a bad idea to kill it.

Because first they come for the smut. Then they come for the art.

Is this truly the amount of mountain-moving we have to do to counteract a single organization's opinion?

It looks like another commenter has already well replied to this, but uh, yes.

thunder crack

Welcome... to the real world.

...

Video games are treats.

Treats only flow by the arcane and abstract machinations of those with power, and those with power are fickle, greedy, and often do not busy themselves with the minutiae of the affairs of the hordes of useless eaters.

I agree with you, the power differential is absurdly vast, the situation is plainly 'unfair' by most viewpoints...

... but the question that matters is what are you going to do about that?