this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
128 points (95.7% liked)

politics

25420 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Matt Gaetz on Monday moved to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy from the top House leadership post, offering a motion to vacate the chair on the House floor – a rare procedural move that can be used to force a vote to remove the speaker.

It’s not yet clear how the challenge to McCarthy will play out, but the effort represents the most serious threat to his speakership to date. A floor vote to oust McCarthy would require a majority to succeed.

“Bring it on,” the California Republican wrote on X shortly after the motion. Gaetz responded to the post with one of his own, writing, “Just did.”

The move marks a major escalation in tensions for a House GOP conference that has been mired in in-fighting and could be thrown into chaos if McCarthy is pushed out of the speakership. It comes as a bloc of House conservatives have continued to thwart McCarthy, voting against key priorities of GOP leadership and repeatedly throwing up roadblocks to the speaker’s agenda.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

… in most predictable motion in Congressional history.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nah, a Biden impeachment attempt was even more predictable. Though they flat out said that was the plan so I don’t know if that counts.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty sure that award goes to “raises? Yes.” But this is a very close second

[–] donuts@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago

McCarthy called Gaetz's bluff and now Gaetz doesn't want to back down for fear of looking weak.

I'm just happy to watch these traitorous little monkeys sling shit at each other.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How is it that every single photo of Matt Gaetz looks like someone is actively rubbing a jalapeño slice against his asshole?

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He's a can of Crisco with a cadaver's face stretched across it. Can't get a lot of range in the facial expressions when that's what you're working with.

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

That's probably one of his kinks

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any chance we could see mccarthy unseated and gaetz removed? That would be pretty fantastic to watch. Not great for the country, mind, as it would lead to another week or two of endless voting for a new speaker, but hilarious to watch nonetheless.

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

In a highly unprecedented move, Speaker McCarthy has opted for trial by combat...

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bickering like children and they think they can hold impeachment hearings on Biden? They can't even function as a single political party much less navigate complexities like fact finding, legal investigative process, and case building.

Gaetz has shown that the Republican party has gone so deep into political paranoia that they fear even each other and must resort to extreme measures like a motion to vacate to "test" ideological purity to one another. The GOP is crumbling but in its complete failure, it will provide a larger path for more extreme megalomaniac personas to invade what the GOP once was.

All this does is ensure that the GOP further descends into madness.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago

I hope you're right because if they remain united, we are deeply fucked.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The more they fight amongst themselves the less damage they can do to the rest of us. Good for them.

[–] coco@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

He is a puppet !!! For who ??

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It comes as a bloc of House conservatives have continued to thwart McCarthy, voting against key priorities of GOP leadership and repeatedly throwing up roadblocks to the speaker’s agenda.

McCarthy is expected to make a procedural move in an attempt to kill the measure to remove him as speaker, potentially as soon as Tuesday, several sources told CNN, in a vote that would be the first sign of where his support lies.

The group then discussed the pros and cons of supporting the motion to vacate, with one of the downsides being it could hinder their ability to finish work on spending bills ahead of the November 17 deadline.

South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman, who is still undecided on his vote, confirmed that there was a meeting with a “good many” GOP members, where they discussed their options and Gaetz addressed the room.

“Members of the Republican Party might vote differently on a motion to vacate if they heard what the speaker had to share with us about his secret side deal with Joe Biden on Ukraine.

In Sunday remarks responding to the thwarted government shutdown, President Joe Biden called on McCarthy and other Republican leaders to follow through on a commitment to hold a standalone vote on funding for Ukraine as it attempts to fight off Russia’s invasion.


The original article contains 1,684 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 87%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!