this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
73 points (98.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63199 readers
153 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Block BEARD bill broadly applies to service providers as defined in section 512(k)(1)(A) of the DMCA. This is a broad definition that applies to residential ISPs, but also to search engines, social media platforms, and DNS resolvers.

Service providers with fewer than 50,000 subscribers are explicitly excluded

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tfowinder@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Ah The land of the free where government is free to do whatever it wants.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I bet they spent more time working on making a cool sounding acronym than they did actually writing the bill. If this actually passed, it would do nothing except encourage people to use an out of geo VPN, I2P, or non-US DNS server.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What worries me about it is how it applies very broadly, so it would mean stuff like the reddit piracy megathread could be prohibited, and make it actually more difficult for people to find or discuss places to safely pirate things

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just means they push it to the hidden layers (signal). its stupid of them. they're just making it harder to manage.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This is an interesting rabbit hole

I tried hitting tilded up black and Gemini space but I'm not seeing watching the way of sites that answer.

Most of the stuff in search isn't working either.

*edit for those trying this, use the search, go home, then click known hosts, there's a LOAD of sites, 80% or so work.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

Bear in mind that the people coming up with this stuff are not completely stupid. Completely corrupt and ignorant perhaps, but not so inept that if they write legislation that strongly encourages practically everyone to use a VPN to avoid the bullshit it isn't a good possibility that their aim (or the aim of those manipulating them) is to generate excuses to eventually make easy-to-use commercial VPN services illegal. Obviously many of us could get around such a ban with ease, but the more difficult they make it the fewer people will do it. There are reasons why not every kid on your average street is an I2P user. What they can't effectively ban they'll suppress by other means.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There will be a follow up bill called Act to Mandate Aggressive Zero-Exception Bans on Anonymous Login & Secure Networks that makes VPNs, TOR, etc illegal. I think they’re working on it in the UK already.

[–] TootGuitar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

AMAZEBALSN?

a) blackburn is the sponsor of kosa who admitted the primary reason was to go after lgbtq spaces b) schiff is garbage c) blocking piracy sites isn't going to make us buy movies and subscribe to steaming services