this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
307 points (99.7% liked)

Canada

10222 readers
425 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A contributing factor may be the number of American car companies with factories hereβ€”I mean, there are a few European/Japanese/whatever auto brands that do some manufacturing here too, but not as much. It's an industry that seems to have a political voice that's larger than its contribution to the national economy (or at least, that's the impression one gets from the news here in Ontario). Lobbying to tweak the rules to make certification easier for American vehicles than others seems on-brand.

If that is part of the reason, Trump may have torpedoed it, but it'll take years for the mess to untangle itself even so.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just you, it's part of what feeds into the western province grievance thing.

[–] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

What's to be aggrieved about? I've never once heard the auto industry being a factor in western alienation. And I've written papers on the subject.

The auto industry is Canada's largest manufacturing industry, contributing more than $15B to GDP and 500,000 good paying jobs. There's good reason to protect it.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I would like an armoured bicycle

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

Armour defeats the purpose of a bicycle, which is being nimble

I would like an armed bicycle

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Doug ford will make that illegal because motorist are worried their paint would get scratched by the armored bike instead of the blood stains from unarmored bikes.

Douggie can go fuck himself in the ear!

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why should I be restricted from driving a reasonable vehicle just because everyone else wants to drive an assault vehicle?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

not to mention that you're punished for it if you don't buy a high riding vehicle, because every other vehicle nowadays has weaponized headlights for lowbeams

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

They hit me right in the eyes even when I'm driving a heavy truck.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

And a weaponized front end that makes collisions with smaller cars more deadly for the smaller car

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

There should be an immediate ban on assault style vehicles and all vehicles sold with black metal panels instead of wood. Fuel tanks should be restricted to 300km and transmissions should be manual not automatic!

Shit, actually I would kill for a tiny, wood paneled, stick shift car...

wow, guess I have to add an /s to this

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The fuel tank restriction could actually be dangerous for extremely rural parts of Canada. I've been stuck for over 7 hours on a rural highway in yhe winter.

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get the other points but why wood panels? Seems like an aesthetic choice really. Don't force PT cruisers on everyone, that's too cruel.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

There was at least one firearm banned in Canada, the all black metal and plastic variant, who's wood stock counterpart was permitted. It was a jab at the smooth brain, black guns are scary, policy makers we have.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The desire to carry water for American companies or European companies by excluding China is strange. Aus doesn't play that game. Trying to be protectionist on dead end ICE manufacturing capability will only serve to put them deeper and deeper into the grave that they want to share with the US.

I think that anybody who's trying to protect ICE manufacturing should take a hard look at what happened in China. They literally killed their ICE manufacturing with their new energy vehicle push. Absolutely gutted it. And they're reaping the rewards of doing so.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Chinese vehicles are built with subsidies and sometimes even slave labor to flood the market at artificially low prices.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The tech and production capacity is good, there just needs to be stricter oversight because at this moment there are no other producers of low cost EVs and I don't really care if they're subsidized when the other players on the market are 15 years behind.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] trk@aussie.zone -1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

oh noes please save me from the being offered the chance to buy modern, well built, and affordable EVs 😒

One more oversized gas guzzler for maximum price please. And shaft me on the services too.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

American ICE manufacturers received way more subsidies than Chinese EV manufacturers.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the west does it it's called freedom but when China foes it it'd called artificial tyranny.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

So is it okay because the West does it too or wdym

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Thankyou kind human. Edit: I will go to hell for this but China having a car company called Chery, must cause confusion if the Ch is a Shuh sound like Chevy. Maybe the naming was on purpose to seem close to the American brand?

[–] Amuletta@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love to have a small electric vehicle, as most of my driving is done inside a small city. The choices are limited and too expensive for my budget.

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bolt euv is relatively low cost. You can get one used for even less

[–] lemonySplit@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

Way too expensive still. And the equinox ev was supposed to be lower msrp than the bolt then they release it at $45-$50k msrp πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

Protectionism so we grow weak and fail πŸ₯°πŸ₯°πŸ₯°

Don't learn from history, Detroit was a one-off right?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They have to meet the joint North American standards regardless. Even the Honda Fit is no longer sold in North America because they figured it wasn't worth putting through the paces. I thought that would be the subcompact car that survived, but no.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am guessing Canadians love big trucks, jacked up?

[–] ODGreen@slrpnk.net 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. The Ford F-series trucks are the best selling car in Canada. Gotta brave those dangerous wide suburban roads to get to the rugged Walmart and haul toilet paper.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago

Adult men require gender affirming vehicles

The pavement Princess!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Fair guess. Some Canadians, but not all.