this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
85 points (94.7% liked)

News

31365 readers
2726 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

For the "life begins at conception" folks, does this mean that the baby was born 30 years old?

[–] moobythegoldensock 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh hell yeah. Start pumping them out after 70 years so they can collect Social Security from birth.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A history teacher in the 22nd century: "And that, class, is how we finally implemented UBI."

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It isn't perfect, but I'll take it.

[–] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

time for a tax audit, he never paid taxes!!!

They never had taxes to pay with no income?

If anything it's a lot of past owed benefits that were never claimed.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Actually I think it does because the article mentions a Christian group that does embryo adoption. They said they were "saving lives"

[–] moobythegoldensock 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The story gets less and less happy as it goes. Particularly the part where she insisted the embryo only go to a white Christian family.

[–] noseatbelt@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

And that she wants to be involved in the kid's life. Wonder what kind of relationship she has with her actual daughter.

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It’s gonna be creepy when babies are born from 100+ year old sperm/embryos.

I wonder if, in the future, babies made from old dna will be more desirable due to all the environmental and chemical impact on our dna.

Like, “my baby doesn’t have three eyes because it’s from 300 year old dna”

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 9 points 2 days ago

We can print DNA iirc, and I'd imagine that tech will only improve with time, so if we really needed to keep some DNA from before some event that degrades all DNA afterwards, it might just be kept around as a computer file and synthesized as needed rather than frozen in living cells.

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Inb4 the knuckle-draggers claim they only want pre-covid vaxx blood.

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

You're way too late with that one unfortunately

[–] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

I only bathe in the blood of babies born from embryos frozen in the 1990s.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

Giving birth to a kid born from your seventh great grandmother’s egg sounds like quite an odd scenario

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

Because, I shit you not, it's cheaper than adoption in the US.