this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
3 points (80.0% liked)

Rant

478 readers
3 users here now

A place where you can rant to your heart's content.

Rules :
  1. Follow all of Lemmy code of conduct.
  2. Be respectful to others, even if they're the subject of your rant. Realize that you can be angry at someone without denigrating them.
  3. Keep it on Topic. Memes about ranting are allowed for now, but will be banned if they start to become more prevalent than actual rants.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I caught one of those motherfuckers who needlessly park shared e-scooters in bicycle racks. He seemed to be taking a picture of his sabotage of the space cyclists need to lock their bicycle to.

Why is this plague of Google-boot-licking shared e-scooter people attacking our bicycle racks (I have been wondering)?

There are laws banning those scooters from blocking sidewalks and doorways. I assume the e-scooter company would get the fine for illegal parking, which they would need to pass on. So (I’m guessing) users photograph their parking job for self-defense from a fine. Is that correct?

Are they just keeping a personal copy of those photos, or does the app require users to transmit the photos? If they are being transmitted, does that mean the e-scooter companies are complicit in a limited resource (bicycle racks) getting clusterfucked?

What is the recourse for individual action? Ideas:

  • stack the scooters in a pile in the bushes whenever the racks are fully packed by shared scooters.
  • put stickers with a red prohibited sign over a scooter on the racks. But of course the problem with that is that it’s fair enough if a personal scooter is locked to a rack. And also unlocked/shared bicycles are the same problem. What is a graphical symbol that represents shared micromobiles but not personal ones? We could list them out (Lime, Bolt, Dott, Volt, etc) but there are too many and they keep changing. Would an e-scooter with a wi-fi symbol be clear?
  • lock the shared vehicles to the racks where they sit. It’s sacraficial, but sends a msg that costs them money (thus a msg that will not be ignored). Not cheap for the activist.
  • pile the shared machines together and lock them together, perhaps using the built-in lock from one of the shared e-bikes.
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] srasmus@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The e-scooter apps I've used do require you to take a photo in the app. Probably so they can ban you if you suck. Where I live, I'm fortunate enough for there to be designated scooter parking in some places. They essentially take a car street parking spot, put posts around it, and label it. Really cleans up the area.

If you aren't somewhere that has a spot like that, most of the time I just park on the city side of the grass. Off walkways, and the worst that can happen is some dead city grass. I couldn't imagine attempting to slide one into a bike rack.

[–] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the feedback. So if the company is collecting pics on the parking, then the company is apparently complicit in bike racks getting stuffed.

They do have the rackless boxes where I am, but not everywhere. I’m not sure if the companies have a requirement to finance those and rent the space, but in any case they are not pulling their own weight in that respect when there is a shortage.

There is one shared bike operator where I am that has stations that the bikes are locked to. It’s a proprietary lock and they must install stalls for them. The bikes must be returned to a stall eventually, to end the billing. It’s an older system than the newer unlocked ones with tracking, but better because the company finances and manages the stalls. They take responsibility for the real estate they consume. It’s also better because your realtime whereabouts is not tracked and you don’t need an app.. you just tap an NFC card on the stall.

[–] srasmus@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

I believe the scooter spots are financed by the city. Scooter pollution was a big problem here when they were first introduced, so I'm sure the alderpeople stepped in.

We also have the racked ebikes, and those are great. I think people dislike them since they require you to have a station at your destination/position, but I think the solution to that is just to build more. The scooters require a ton of overhead to be moved and charged.

I'd be in full support of banning use of bike racks for scooters. I think they're a useful micromobility option, but they were implemented very poorly. Hell, maybe they could even build their own racks. Then you'd be guaranteed to always have a scooter fairly well charged.