this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
1116 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

8778 readers
2064 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the timings for school and its length were not dictated by health needs nor education needs.

it was chosen to match parents work schedule, and to aclimatize children to factory work.

so its not out of ignorance of the childs well-being, but indifference to it

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it was chosen to match parents work schedule

I can't find a good source, but from what I've seen its actually student work schedules that dictate school start times.

Elementary and Middle Schools tend to start much later in the day (in part to conserve buses). But local Chambers of Commerce and Rotary Club groups will often lobby for earlier high school start times so that students are out of school in time for a 5pm work shift.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

In some countries the school start at 6.30 AM so that parents can take their children to school before they start work at 8 AM.

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 12 points 3 days ago

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01106-6

Abstract: "Aspects of modern society, such as artificial lighting and rigid schedules, create ‘social jetlag’ — a mismatch between biological chronotypes and societal demands. This circadian misalignment particularly affects evening chronotypes, leading to sleep deprivation, mental health issues and physical disorders. Flexible schedules and environmental modifications could restore natural sleep patterns and improve well-being."

[–] osugi_sakae@midwest.social 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

High school teacher here. Obviously, I don't speak for everyone, but many of us wish school would start at a more reasonable time for students. We don't enjoy trying to teach first (and second, and third) period classes where many students are either absent or asleep. And of course, we care about the students and know it would be much healthier for them to sleep in. School can start around 10:00, thanks. But, as others have pointed out, the schedule is not dictated by what is best for the students.

Edit: some of the students in the schools I work at have to get up around 5:00. The often wait for 30+ minutes for buses to come (but that is a "the district doesn't care about the students" issue, not a start time issue).

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 128 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I was an incredibly angsty teenager, mad at the world and hostile to just about everyone by default. Apathetic, grumpy, and uninterested in physical activity or the things I liked as a preteen.

After having a baby and getting very little sleep for 6 months I recognized some of my old patterns. Turns out, it wasn't just part of being a teen, I was chronically sleep deprived. I was up at 6am most days back then, when I would sleep until 1pm on weekends. I think a lot of teens are unfairly characterized as angry and defiant when they're operating on half or a quarter of the sleep they need.

Ah yes, I remember those accusations of grumpiness. It’s the classic “MY issues are because of the circumstances around me. YOUR issues are because that’s just who you are.” The lack of empathy so many adults express is truly concerning.

[–] scott@lemmy.org 104 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

The way I see it, you're probably freest from the ages one to four Around the age of five you're shipped away for your body to be stored They promise education, but really they give you tests and scores And they predictin' prison population by who scoring the lowest

So much of the education system is centered on child abuse and grooming children to accept abuse as adults

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 73 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Also it's affordable daycare for kids so parents can work.

[–] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago

That's the real reason it starts early: so two working parents can get the kids out the door and then still have time to get to work themselves

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I was in my late 20s when I realised just how much stress morning stuff is causing me, and had caused me for two decades.
(my solution was just to come to the office at 11 most days & now I also sleep more hours on average, but that's is a separate issue for me)

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

My mental health radically improved my senior year when I was ahead on credits and could skip the first block of classes each morning.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

One reason for the early starts for high schools is that by staggering the start times for high school, middle school, and elementary school, school districts can use fewer buses and fewer drivers. If all the schools started at the same (more reasonable) time, you'd need three times as many buses and drivers and each driver would only get one or two hours a day (and thus would find something else to do, making the existing shortage of drivers even worse). The district I drive for has a transportation budget of about $3 million a year - we would not be able to afford $9 million a year and still afford our administrators' enormous salaries.

If you just started all schools later by an hour, the elementary school kids would start at 9:30 AM which would not work out very well, either.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (8 children)

East Asian countries solve this by having the kids take public transit; just run a few extra buses and trains on the routes kids take, then you don't need dedicated vehicles that sit idle all day.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

With trains all you have to do is add an extra passenger car or two for the peak times and keep the number of trains running the same. You could also increase frequency during peak times if you have the track, train and driver availability to do that

[–] RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, that sounds like socialism.

Good thing we were saved from the horrors of broadly accessible and efficient mass transit decades ago.

[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Could you imagine how dangerous mass transit would be if it was full of middle schoolers, calling out your biggest insecurities, while you’re just trying to get to work? John Mulaney educated us on the danger of them years ago.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

If I remember correctly most of the suggestions to account for that actually has elementary and middle schoolers start before high schoolers since high schoolers are the ones that need the most sleep while also struggling the most to go to sleep early

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (13 children)

They don't need to push everyone later, they just need to start the younger kids early, and the older kids later, which is the opposite of what most districts do now. Pre-teens have no problem getting up at 6AM.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Since the whole problem lies with parents' work schedule, we should all push work time to begin at 10am instead of 8am, so kids can get to school a bit later in the morning. Everybody gets to sleep a bit more. Problem fucking solved

[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But then I would have to work until 8pm. That sounds horrible.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

7pm if you take an hour lunch, 6pm if you don't take a lunch.

I've worked a 10-7 shift before. Some people hated it, but I actually loved it. I got to stay up every night to a reasonable 12-1, okay videogames with friends, slept until a nice morning, woke up and drove to work. It was by far the best work shift time I've ever had. It also helped that I lived 3 minutes away, so I would literally wake up at like 9, sss, then drive to work. Saved so much gas at that job hahaha. I'd fill up my Corolla like once a month as long as I didn't visit friends too much. And I was in an apartment with underground parking, so the uv damage to my car was like nothing.

The only downside is you don't get to do errands during the week. Which.... If you plan very very well isn't an issue, but more often than not was an issue.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

And god forbid your circadian rhythm doesn't align and you fall asleep in class.

You can get referred for a drug test because only high people fall asleep during the day.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

I have always struggled with sleep onset insomnia. In an ideal world, I'd probably sleep from around 5 am until noon, and my best working hours are from 7pm until 11pm, without fail. Even when I am exhausted from forcing myself to get up early for an extended period, I'll still perk up in the late evening, and struggle to sleep before 3am. This combined awfully with school.

I remember once that I was so exhausted, I literally fell asleep while walking, and I didn't wake up when I hit the floor. What's striking in hindsight is how little sympathy there was. I wasn't accused of being a drug user, but there were plenty of comments about laziness, which is absurd given that I was obviously severely exhausted.

A friend was the primary carer for a disabled relative, and this required her to get up at 5am each day, and to get up during the night to administer medication. She would often fall asleep in class, and she frequently got detention for this (which she would then often need to skip, to ensure she could get home in time to pick up siblings from school). Speaking with her years later, she lamented that if teachers had been more sympathetic and actually tried to understand what was going on here, it might've led to there being formal support to care for her relative. The amount of work she was doing was absurd for anyone, let alone a 13 year old, but she didn't know this, let alone that there were support channels to help young carers like her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 36 points 5 days ago

You can't cause delinquency if you're too busy getting 8 hours of sleep.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

In my 30s and I'm still mad about it.

Especially considering how much time at school was an absolute waste.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Yea that only happens because capitalism needs your parents to slave their ass off which can only happen if their kids go to school earlier than their already early starting job

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Generally, I don't think that applies to high schoolers. They can manage themselves in the morning. We should have their school start last

America also has some deep structural issues that children aren't able to get to school by themselves. In Japan, grade school children are able to get to and from school by themselves in most of the country. In America, parents aren't allowed to leave children unattended, and certainly aren't allowed to let them go to school alone

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] nuachtan@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We've known this for decades, but almost no districts will make the changes necessary. The youngest grades (K-4 or 5) should be the first schools to start in the morning, and the HS the last.

What happens when that is suggested is people balk at either sports programs needing to be cut or the argument that the older siblings need to be out of school to babysit the younger siblings.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, exactly.

Almost 30 years now we've known that shifting around the school schedule by roughly a max of 2 hours would result in significantly improved learning across the board, for basically 0 cost... and we don't do it.

America is a scam.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dermanus@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's nuts to me that American schools start so early. Ours had first bell around 8:30. By high school is was closer to nine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Every year I tell timetabling "don't inflict 9am classes on my students, it provably punishes poorer students (commute costs) and drives poor engagement", every year they ignore me.

Many of your teachers hated morning classes too.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

for years my mom forced us to go.to bed at 8pm ( I only.rebel.when I was about 12). All my childhood. Mind you we didn't had phones so we would be there on the bed in the dark THINKING. And that's why I have anxiety.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Nothing lowkey about it. Shit's fucked up.

load more comments
view more: next ›