this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
27 points (93.5% liked)

politics

25032 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Can she just fuck off please.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Just like when Noem released her book, you'll see headlines just enough to push sales.

[–] turdburglar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

ok great. now do american president

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

She lost to Trump. She should consider never running for anything ever again. That should be career-ending.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How does one lose to Hitler

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Traditionally?

Election fraud and the reality that enough of country supports fascism to make it believable

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

taking the fall in a fixed match is not the same as outright losing

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It should have been such a blowout that rigging would be impossible. A real leftist candidate could easilly beat out a 3 million voter deficit. Just look at Mamdani's win in NYC, and he's just a social democrat.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given the circumstances- she was the best candidate. She did a stellar job cleaning up a campaign that was mired and bogged down in a flaming rubbish pile.

And yes it does seem like there was hellalotta cheating going on.

Ultimately she had 90 days or so to go against a douche who’s been campaigning and retconning his image for the four years prior.

The loss is not her fault. I place that entirely at Biden fucking shit up and holding on far too long.

All of that said- she absolutely shouldn’t be the ‘28 candidate. I’m pissed that she conceded before it was even official, and when there was clearly some question. They didn’t even look into it. (Smoke doesn’t always mean fire, but you’re an idiot if you don’t check.)

Then she disappeared as the US turned to shit and comes out with a book deal?!

Sorry. Nope. I respect what she did, but that doesn’t mean she’s the best option next time.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Without a primary and any opponents, how did you determine she was the best candidate? If you're referring to her being the VP, it was widely reported the Biden cabinet was upset with her handling of the interview on the border crisis. After that they gave her the cold shoulder and barely handed her any meaningful projects. She was not prepared because she refused to listen to her aides and then afterwards blamed them for not properly prepping her.

She was as much of a disappointment as Biden was. Would have been a better move to break clean from both of them.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

By the time that Biden stepped down, there was no time for a primary. (And let’s be honest, that farce ran before wasn’t a true primary.)

She was the only person that could, at the time, get everyone into lockstep with her. She was also competent, experienced and skilled.

Aside from Israel/Palestine, her political positions weren’t particularly offensive either. (She should have thrown Biden under that bus, but I get why she didn’t. Hell. Biden should have dove under for her.)

I would have much preferred another; though they would never have manage as well as Harris did… particularly as Biden gave grudging support for her.

In the context of that moment in time, she was the only person with a chance at beating Trump, and that’s what made her “best”.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

She was also competent

Did you not read the portion in my post where I said she was deemed incompetent by Biden (and many others)?

Does this speak "competence"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXCN0xYJDuo