this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

Fitness

4522 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought a pair of barefoot shoes recently. If you haven't heard about this type of shoe, it's kind of a loosely-defined category, but generally means:

  1. It's wider than a typical shoe. Your feet should not be constrained by the "walls" of the shoe.
  2. The materials are thin and flexible. It should not be very rigid or provide much support.
  3. The sole should be flat, with no elevated heel.

Barefoot shoes have gained an almost religious following. I'm not a full convert, but I have enjoyed wearing mine at the gym -- for the most part.

I don't really need many features in a shoe; I do a pretty basic strength training workout. Like, the kind of workout that many people wear Converse for. And for that, they're great. Actually, really great. The sole is very thin and flat, which feels good for squats. And when doing things like lunges, I feel like they have forced me to improve my balance and stability, since the shoe itself is not helping you at all in that department.

I've also started running recently, after not doing that for many years. I have also enjoyed wearing these while running, but with the caveat that I'm running on a soft, rubber surface track. I think if I was running on pavement, I couldn't wear these. By design, they have very little cushion, and I think that would be painful if I wasn't running on a soft surface. In fact, even just walking down the street with them was a little jarring the first day, although I've gotten used to it now (and might have softened my stride a little, too).

The pair I bought are the Xero Dillon Canvas. I don't buy into all of the health benefits that the barefoot crowd often claims you get from this type of footwear, but I have definitely liked them for the gym. I'd buy them for the same reason that you'd buy a pair of Converse: they're thin and flat, but these are even thinner and flatter. I also like that they're easy to carry around. They take up very little space in the gym bag.

Aesthetically, at first they look strange because of their wider toe box, but that's just because they're wider than what you're used to seeing on your feet. That feeling soon wore off, and I think they look like just plain old sneakers now, especially when viewed from the side. I doubt other people would even notice anything different about them.

Specific to the pair I bought: I got the white ones, and the canvas material gets dirty very easily. But I found that they're easy to clean with soap and water. (See a before/after photo here.)

Has anyone else tried a pair of barefoot shoes before? What did you think?

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etnaphele@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Full convert here, cannot wear anything else (apart from on road bike shoes for obvious reasons).

Really nice post! But I rate converse as flat but stiff and heavy, in addition to narrow.

Take it easy with running or you risk injuring yourself! I run either with Vibram FiveFingers or with sandals, the ground feel and control is unsurpassed, but you have to slowly get used to it. Then you can run barefoot on concrete with no problems :)

I moderate a community, if you’re interested: !barefoot_shoes@lemmy.world

[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Have you modified your stride at all? Do you run with a forefoot strike now, and did you already do that before switching to barefoot shoes?

[–] Etnaphele@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Not really, I always had pretty neutral striking. The good thing, in my view, is that minimal footware forces you to stride correctly. One should not overthink forefoot strike, it can do more bad than good. An actual good strike is putting the whole foot down, with the front impacting slightly before the heel. Full forefoot striking is only possible while sprinting.

[–] xep@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

The barefoot shoes definitely helped me figure out the strike. Am also full convert.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Don't heel strike while running regardless of what shoe you're wearing... unless it's one of those fancy shoes that pretty much act like springs and shock absorbers, it's only going to fuck your knees over time.

I got the fingershoe things a long time ago for running and they're great, though not really anything a proper fitting ultralight shoe couldn't do. They're just very comfortable and very light. Otherwise it's a bit weird to feel the thin material between toes, but that's easy to get used to.

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 5 points 2 days ago

I used to have a barefoot pair for the gym. I liked that they are much lower profile than sneakers, thus were more compact in my gym bag.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Picked up Merrell Road Gloves about fifteen years ago because they fit well and were 40% off. Wore them for a while, then ditched them after about six months.

Fast forward about two years and I read an article about the cave man marathon guy who runs marathons barefoot.

That article laid out the benefits of toe splay and strengthening your feet instead of relying on cushioning.

I dug the old Merrells out and tried them again, this time intentionally focusing on toe splay and trying not to just heel strike every step.

Within a month of walking my dogs like that twice a day my feet and calves were much stronger.

I have a different problem now. I've worn through two pair of road gloves now and they don't make then any more.

I've tried a couple of other zero drop shoes but none provided the same support and comfort of those Merrells.

It seems now that companies have discovered the community of barefoot shoe aficionados and are using full advantage, producing either cardboard garbage shoes or molded rubber garbage shoes. There are still some good options but I have been burned too many times ordering online and within a week running into issues. The Xero "100% waterproof hiking shoe" was particularly disappointing, as it was not waterproof, no good for hiking, and basically garbage that I now use for light yard work.

So, yes, I definitely would agree that if you have a good pair of supportive barefoot shoes there are helpful benefits to using them, but finding the right shoe is a challenge.

[–] mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just out of curiosity and as a non-barefoot-shoe-user: what support do you miss? I thought the whole point was to be as little supported as possible without being fully barefoot

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Merrell had a formed sole that gave juuust a tiny bit of a curve under the arch. That's it, nothing crazy, but since it was my first barefoot shoe I just got used to it

[–] mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the clarification! I can see that that makes it hard to find a new good shoe

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hey, i have been using barefoot shoes exclusively for 6 years, though i dropped out of the fitness game when I moved, so i am no athlete anymore... So you can probably take this with a grain of salt.

If you are into running, run barefoot on clean asphalt or tracks or concrete. Seriously. That is the #1 way to improve your form because you can really feel your form and what is happening (pawing off of the stride, strike position, time on foot vs in air, etc...) Barefoot shoes are a middle ground that are great for moving to terrains that would normally hurt your foot after you have fixed form.

If you don't improve your form and keep either heel striking, pawing off the ground, etc... Are just compounded when wearing normal shoes and that leads to injuries. Barefoot shoes can do the same because with the exception of some thing sandals, you don't have tactile feedback.

Honestly, after fixing my form I can understand the ultrarunners much better because running felt like an order of magnitude more effortless.

Things you are likely to run into: tight calves, blisters when you slide your feet or paw off the ground, very dirty feet, and possibly Achilles tendon pain if you are very inflexible and/or have had an injury in the past (IIRC biomechanics are slightly different and it leads to a "more natural" lengthening or stretching of the Achilles that many aren't used to, but I could be wrong, I never had that)

My fat ass (184cm/96kg) still runs 5-10k with little effort a couple times a month when I have the time and motivation.

There is a guy on reddit who is a very seasoned barefoot runner very active in that subreddit who has great advice (sadly I don't think he moved to Lemmy)

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've mostly only worn "barefoot" shoes for a decade or two. Vibram and Vivo, mostly. Used to use kind of zero drop shoes even before that. I hate clompy soles and ankle twisting heels and wear the minimum that I can get away with.

The only exception has been kind of combat boots or such that I wear for dirty work or places where there's particularly hazardous stuff on the ground or high probability of sinking in mud or water or slush (forest).

And formal dress shoes once in a blue moon. There seems to be some options for that these days, but it'll be a long time before I need a new pair.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Had some Altra trail shoes for hiking, but had to give them due to heel spurs. They were great for the wide noses since I have wide feet. They also wore dow quite fast, which was not so great.