this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
293 points (98.0% liked)

politics

25032 readers
2167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same reason they embraced every policy that killed the Biden campaign; Median Voter Theory.

Democrats imagine a swing voter who agrees with 80% of what the republicans say, and then adjust their own policy and messaging to appeal to that imaginary voter.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago

They are still afraid of Reagan democrats even though this isn't 1984 in the morning, and that's the generous explanation. The less generous explanation is that there are controlled opposition party and they threw the election on purpose

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

From what I've heard, top Democrats hamstrung Harris' already patched together campaign. She was up against the clock and they threw a wrench in it because they didn't want to offend the "fuck your feelings" crowd.

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was around the time the campaign's approval peaked too, if I remember right. People liked when Walz called Republicans out and actually stated the obvious, but the DNC leadership decided after 2000 that they don't give a shit about what Democratic voters want; the DNC was already handing the country to Trump again long before Biden even dropped out.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The democratic party and trying to court the unreasonable illogical conservative vote, name a more iconic duo

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I don't want to appease anyone who's "moderate." The US is right enough as it is. Especially now, if the US wants to recover from Trump, it needs to make a very aggressive and swift push to the left.

name a more iconic duo

Capitalism and the erosion of democracy.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

There were really loud persuasive voices calling for the Dems to try to siphon off dissatisfied GOP voters. Apparently they convinced their overpaid advisors because sure as shit Kamala was campaigning with a fucking Cheney (who at least has a soul but still a piece of crap politically).

Year after year they watch the success of Bernie and other leftist candidates and decide they're going to tack right JUST ONE MORE TIME. Definitely goes to show how well the right has demonized the left.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because the Democratic Party leadership decided it was too effective and told Walz to back off

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How do they all just look evil

Combination of careful choice of photos and them genuinely being evil, I guess 🤷

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why did we ever stop calling them weird?

Because it has been normalised.

By the way OP, you missed the opportunity to call them of GOP-- the shorthand for guardians of pedophiles.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah they're weirdo freaks. Incompetent and corrupt but definitely also weird.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Criminals who need to be in prison, not weird, the justice system is weird for not enforcing penalties for criminals of child sexual abuse

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Top Row (Left to Right):

  1. Tim Scott ?
  2. Pam Bondi (Former Florida Attorney General)
  3. Doug Burgum (Governor of North Dakota)
  4. Not sure ?
  5. Doug Collins (Former Congressman from Georgia)
  6. Sean Duffy (Former Congressman from Wisconsin)

Second Row (Left to Right):

  1. Linda McMahon (Former SBA Administrator)
  2. Kristi Noem (Governor of South Dakota)
  3. John Ratcliffe (Former Director of National Intelligence)
  4. Katie Britt (Senator from Alabama)
  5. Marco Rubio (Senator from Florida)
  6. Elise Stefanik (Congresswoman from New York)

Third Row (Left to Right):

  1. Not sure ?
  2. Wesley Hunt (Congressman from Texas)
  3. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  4. Scott Perry (Congressman from Pennsylvania)
  5. J.D. Vance (Senator from Ohio, current VP)
  6. Mike Johnson (Speaker of the House)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tldr "we" stopped calling them weird because it was actually working and democrats are allergic to winning. sample as that.


see, fascists love being perceived as scary, bad, even evil... fascism is an ideology of insecurity. crying about how scary they are, how threatened you feel, how they'll destroy everything you hold dear... that gives them power. they love that shit.

if anything you're pushing more pathetic insecure cunts to their side because they would rather side with the scary villains who say they will actually do shit than the people who just whine and do nothing else.

but calling them weird really, really annoyed them. to the point that they tried to reverse uno it ("i think saying men can be women is what's weird!") and pretend they don't care ("everyone's weird in a way, right? right?") or even outright cry that you should stop.

it was working because the bottomless insecurity that makes fascism appealing to begin with relies on defaultism of the self. to them they must be the default and everyone else must be weird. these are people who have nothing going for them. no personality, no morals, no one who likes them. they must be superior because they're the normal ones. that's all that they can cling to. that's why bigotry is easy for them. they can be superior for no reason other than existing as themselves. being white, straight, cis, having born somewhere... things they don't have to work for. things you can't take away from them. those things must be normal.

once you take that away they can't deal with that. being scary is powerful. being weird, bad weird, that's what others are supposed to be. that's not superior. it's not powerful. so they hated that.

naturally democrats realized it was a good play so they stopped it and instead insisted that you be impressed by how Liz fucking Cheney and other fucking republican demons endorsed the democratic candidate. wow thanks.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

tldr "we" stopped calling them weird because it was actually working and democrats are allergic to winning. sample as that.

In other words: “controlled opposition”

I'm guessing actual human skeletons at this point.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

You are missing so many more.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Mike Johnson needs to be on that poster. Then we need to blow it up and have ir all billboards and tv advertising 24 hours a day. I say on Faux News.

The devil's advocates.