this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
318 points (99.7% liked)

News

31365 readers
2928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This piece of shit LMAO

Republican Sen. Rick Scott, who was not born wealthy but is now worth hundreds of millions of dollars, according to his public filings, said he agrees lawmakers shouldn't be trading stocks. But he defended the ability for members of Congress to be rich, and called attacks on the wealthy "disgusting."

"He made a reference to billionaires, okay?" Scott said of Hawley. "I don't know when in this country it became a negative to make money. But somehow, if you've made money, you're supposedly — I think Senator Hawley suggests — you shouldn't be serving, because you might trade stocks."

"Anybody want to be poor? I don't." Scott continued. "Right? So this idea that we're going to attack people because they make money is wrong. Is absolutely wrong. We should cherish all of our different backgrounds. ... So, I think it's disgusting what is going on here."

[–] Agrajag@scribe.disroot.org 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rick Scott champion of the people

https://newrepublic.com/post/168843/rick-scott-oversaw-one-largest-medicaid-frauds-history-wants-to-be-senate-gop-leader

The former hospital company CEO oversaw what was the biggest case of Medicare fraud at the time. Under his leadership, Columbia/HCA gave kickbacks to doctors to refer patients and then made patients’ conditions appear worse than they were so Medicare would pay more.

When Scott was forced out of the company as it was under investigation, he left with $300 million in stock, a $5.1 million severance, and a $950,000-per-year consulting contract for five years. The hospital, meanwhile, was fined $1.7 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in history until that point.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

WTF, this dude should be in jail, not Congress...

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

Don't forget this is the same guy who, as Governor of Florida, instituted drug testing requirements for welfare recipients. The administrative burden of conducting the drug tests cost taxpayers more money than it saved from excluding those who tested positive.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"We should cherish all of our different backgrounds," including his background of getting unimaginably rich through crime, while pinning it on others so they take the fall.

[–] henfredemars 4 points 2 days ago

That’s how you get to Congress. Unethical, evil, and without morals.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

Any more they’re one and the same if they have an (R) next to their name.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I think Senator Hawley suggests — you shouldn’t be serving, because you might trade stocks.

I added emphasis to show how Scott even managed to rebut his own argument with a single word. He's admitting he's supposed to be "serving". That's because he's supposed to be a servant. He's supposed to be a public servant. Even if it's possible to get rich, obviously, a public servant's first priority is to the public, right?

He's like a fucking butler trying to defend why it's okay that he took the silver serving trays.

Either you're "serving" or you're not. Rick Scott is obviously not serving. He's eating from the buffet while everybody else is starving.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

The point is where the money comes from, but he knows that. He just feels called out. Victim millionaires.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 30 points 2 days ago

Hawley is still a piece of shit; he’s just up for reelection and it’s trying to run from his vote on the Big FuckedUp Bill. Don’t let him dodge accountability- vote that TRASH out!

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure the only reason any conservative or centrist politicians are voting to pass this (and I include Nancy Pelosi in that list) is because they know Trump will veto it 100%.

So they get to look good and can point to this (failed) legislation anytime anyone complains about their stock trading in the future - "I tried to stop it!" and it comes at a time when Trump's popularity is already circling the drain, so Republicans don't think him taking a small hit matters.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This will not stop stock trading. It will stop stock trading in the open.

I think it's a start. This is a form of permissible corruption currently. At least make it's clear that it's corrupt.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Why on Earth would you argue for that to remain legal tho? At least make them open themself to criminal sanction, how would that be any loss. Make it less of a sure thing and more like the massive risk it should be, in line with anyone outiside that inner sphere who tries to pull such shit

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They'll just start a private fund like Berkshire Hathaway and send emails to the fund manager who used to be their broker.