this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
118 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

39791 readers
240 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Install Navidrome!

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How long until my grandparents send their ID and personal info to some scammer because they think they have to?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 day ago

Even just getting a picture risks this. It's so ridiculous. A TOTP code makes so much more sense.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, governments like the UK are forcing this.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago

I loathe Spotify. But blame here falls on the UK government.

Of course, if Spotify fought this half as hard as they fight Apple…

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

compliance remains unacceptable

[–] kbal@fedia.io 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A strange choice given that you don't even need to have a face to enjoy music.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 7 points 2 days ago

Finally, somebody looking out for the faceless among us.

[–] TurboLag@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The headline is misleading. It only applies if you want to watch videos tagged 18+.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You say that as if it makes the idea somehow less insane. I hope the billionaire clique pushing this shit has miscalculated and there are still enough people not so far gone that they're ever going to let the technofascists scan their faces in exchange for the privilege of spending money and being advertised at.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

There should be strong pushback. You need to be quite insane to let someone scan your face when accessing insert random fetish porn.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

You're overlooking the question as to exactly who gauges the content to decide whether it's 18+.

Song disparaging the autocracy? 18+.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

I'm glad I got all my shit off of there already.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How long now until I'm going to have to have back-alley surgery to replace my eyes as the only means of blocking ads and remaining anonymous, ala Minority Report? 🤔

Hello, Mr Yakamoto. How are those tank tops working out?

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago

Oh no! Anyway...

Honestly Spotify is a terrible company and service, like all streaming. You own nothing. They pay artists peanuts.

Hope this leads to people buying music and/or supporting artists directly.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure that will just push more people to get their music from soulseek and torrents.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Governments will never understand that piracy is a service problem.

[–] libre@badatbeing.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Governments will never understand that resorting to extralegal measures in order to obtain what it is you want and need is due to difficulty in being able to procure it through legal channels, very broadly applicable

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Capitalism will never accept that piracy is the free market voting with it's wallet, because capitalism is actually not pro-free market

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

Capitalism accepts it, thats why corporations lobby for governments to be more aggressive on piracy, while they keep squeezing profits. When governments should just give the corporations the middle finger.

[–] WaffleWarrior@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why are we all playing this game? Why not just say screw the UK? Isn't that easier?

Or is this just an excuse to up the surveillance and potential ad revanue?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The UK is a decent sized market. It's harder to ignore than you'd think.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

For some context for Americans, the UK has about the same population as the two most populated US states, California and Texas, combined.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My family canceled our plan when they announced their investment in Helsing which makes AI weapons.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Cancelled mine after they price hiked a dollar for the third time in like a year lol

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

High-tech western military investments in an age of Russian aggression is actually a good thing to do. And it's even European instead of US or Israel.

I see no reason not to fully support this. Sure, a pacifist world would be awesome, but that would require a lot of things to happen that are not realistic at all. The alternative to european defense investments is not peace, it's death and oppression.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

Weapons, but especially digital weapons, will always be turned upon their subordinate populace if it suits the oligarchy