this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
581 points (99.0% liked)

Today I Learned

23884 readers
532 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xylight@fedi.phtn.app 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Does anyone actually like Comcast? I feel like absolutely 0 consumers, no matter the political background, enjoy the Comcast experience.

My most recent Comcast crashout™️ was how their router does port forwarding.

First, you have to pay an extra fee per month to get more than 1TB monthly data usage (crazy)

Next, you can't change the default DNS server (annoying)

Third, I had this random issue where the gateway would randomly force clients to be ipv6 only, and sometimes ipv4 only. (Diabolical)

But their port forwarding was the worst.

I, as an advanced user, go to the admin panel. EVERYBODY who knows what tf port forwarding is and why they'd want to do it would use this admin panel.

I go to advanced. Wait 5 seconds for their god awful panel to load. I click "port forwarding". while I wait, I reflect on the fact that this panel has a 6mb JavaScript bundle for absolutely no reason. And then, the page loads.

"Port forwarding has been moved to the My xFi page -- some link -- manage your router easier than ever!" - I DONT WANT EASIER THAN EVER!!!! I AM PORT FORWARDING. I AM NOT A 79 YEAR OLD GRANDPA WHO NEEDS AN APP TO RESTART THE WIFI.

Whatever. I go to the page. Log in to the mandatory account that I shouldn't need, because a router is independent of external services (or at least should be). After I log in and download the 8 gigabyte JavaScript bundle, a new page appears. "Download the xFi app for easier access". I HAVE TO PULL OUT MY PHONE AND DOWNLOAD SOME RANDOM APP FOR "EASY ACCESS" TO A FEATURE THAT ONLY PEOPLE WHO DONT CARE ABOUT EASE OF ACCESS WOULD USE!

I download the app. I log in. Get redirected to a WebView. I log in twice. Finally.

My god, this is the most atrocious app I've ever seen. No dark theme, probably not native kotlin or java or anything. The backstack makes no sense, some pages will exit out of two simultaneously.

I finally find the port forwarding page. I click "Add a port forward".

Instead of forwarding to an IP address, you have to select from a list of NAMED devices. The router isn't detecting the hostname of my home server, and the router won't let me assign a new IP address.

I desperately try and fix that, but it turns out the list updates on a fixed timer of 2 minutes, where it suddenly appears.

I click Add port forward again, and select my home server. I added port 443. Suddenly, the router seems to reboot completely, which was strange. After it finally reboots, I add port 222. IT REBOOTS AGAIN! THIS APP MANUALLY REBOOTS THE ROUTER FOR EVERY SINGLE CHANGE MADE TO PORT FORWARDS!

Luckily those were the only ports I planned to port forward.

Later while debugging this terrible router, it turns out FOR SOME REASON OTHER LESS ADVANCED OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE HERE! I CAN MANAGE UPNP, DMZ ZONES, WHAT IS HAPPENING

Thank you for reading my rant. I needed to scream into the void about this.

What's funny is later on injust gave up and started to use cloudflare tunnels, nullifying the need for port forwarding. Maybe I should just go completely ipv6 too.

[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

As someone who's never had an issue with Comcast. I still hate comcast for the pure fact that they have a monopoly in my area.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I used to work at Comcast as a programmer (consultant, never worked directly for them). The only surprising thing about your story is that you were eventually able to do what you were trying to do. Software and apps at Comcast are overseen by a constantly rotating cast of executives and managers, and are mostly written by a constantly rotating cast of contractors, most of whom are provided by InfoSys (who provide workers that can only stay in the country for six months at a time). A few people here and there are competent but it makes no difference as nobody is involved with any project for long and documentation is nearly nonexistent.

I was only there for a few years, but by the end I (a consultant grunt) was constantly having to explain to vice presidents why certain things were even being done in the first place. For example, I had been put to work ensuring that Comcast's suite of apps passed accessibility testing (mainly seeing - pun intended - that their apps were usable by blind and low-vision people). I was on my third VP by the end of this process, and she asked why we cared whether or not blind people could use these apps. Um, possibly because we faced million-dollar-a-month fines from the FCC if our apps failed the accessibility tests?

Fun fact about all the InfoSys contractors: I was there before the second Comcast tower in Philadelphia was completed, working at the company's HQ. There were enormous numbers of InfoSys employees working in the building. You would go to meet someone to talk about some issue, and there would be 7 or 8 people working in an office meant for one person. And this was on nearly every floor in the building. The scuttlebutt was that Comcast executives had gotten mightily sick of there being so many Indians in the building (even Indian executives said this was the case) and that they had commissioned the second tower (called the Comcast Technology Center) to get most of them out of their HQ.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

So, the cheap assholes who run Comcast are also racist. What a not surprise.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Your first mistake was using a Comcast router. I just use a Surfboard to connect and got my own router that I have 100% control over.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My first IT adjacent job was remote support for Support Dot Com who contracted me out to Comcast. This was just as they were trying to get away from the maligned 'comcast' brand by calling everything 'Xfinity' like they think their customers are idiots. Well, turns out they mostly are. I don't even think I lasted six months. Despite having the best metrics in the company, I just couldn't take the abuse, or the lack of downtime between calls.

Anyway the point is you can call up Comcast and have them put your router into 'bridge mode' making it essentially an expensive modem, then connect your own router.

[–] Baleine@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 143 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And IMDB is owned by Amazon

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago

And many bad reads

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I remember when IMDb was fully free and it was normal to download the entire database to run locally on one's own computer.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Im another 10 or 15 years we're going to be trying to explain how it was possible to create things just for enjoyment to be part of something, and people will think we're conspiracy wack jobs for suggesting anything was functional before Googazon made everything we interact with.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

And yet here we are, at Lemmy, where things are slightly less corporate.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We're practically there already. 10-15yr is optimistic imo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] msprout@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

"you knew how to make a website from basic markup? Okay grandpa, let's get you to bed."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anzo@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

That's why we have tmdb.org themoviedb ;)

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 102 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

No wonder I find their scores so unreliable

Edit: I also now kind of want to do a web scraping project and see if there's any correlation between scores and whether the media in question is owned by Comcast or Warner Bros

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I usually find the tomato review pretty good. There have been times where I thought movies were shite that had a high user score.

But the critics score on there is utterly useless to me, I never agree with their shit.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Disagreeing with the critics is a time honored cinematic tradition. It's like they're always expecting Oscar worthy stories and performances. Sometimes I just wanna watch a bunch of cars go fast, or explosions go off, that doesn't mean it's inherently a bad movie.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

But there's still a good and a bad way to make those movies. I usually find RT a good indicator if a movie I'm interested in will be worth watching. Especially looking at both scores. The critic score is a good indicator if the movie is competently made, the user score shows if people felt entertained. If it's 50% critics and 80% user it's one of those that won't get Oscars but should be fun to watch once. If it's 70% critic and 40% user it's that the director tried something unconventional and it didn't click with people. Etc.

I used to work at the Comcast Center in Philly. In 2010 they won the Consumerist's "Worst Company in the World" contest (after being the runner-up the previous year). The following year they sent out a company-wide email asking employees and contractors to vote for any other company. They were bailed out by BP and Deepwater Horizon, "fortunately".

They would also regularly send out emails telling employees to download the Comcast and Xfinity apps and rate them 5 stars. I would just assume there's a correlation between rotten tomato scores and ownership of the media.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (2 children)

and metacritic is owned by fandom

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck Fandom. They recently put registration mandatory even to read comments on a page.

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 2 points 2 days ago

Fun fact, fandom is made by the same guy who made wikipedia. He’s a bit of a capitalist brain.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And in turn Fandom is owned by Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales. Which makes me uncomfortable in strange ways.

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

from wikipedia: Fandom was acquired in 2018 by TPG Inc. and Jon Miller through Integrated Media Co.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wales is still president of the company, and presumably has a continuing financial stake in it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The context “Rotten Tomatoes” primed my brain to interpret the (75%) as a score, and I was like “There’s no way Comcast is even in double digits.”

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

same... it took me a second to re-calibrate the context

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe the CEO is a former Disney exec as well. I remember reading up about this when they were messing with all the review scores for the Star Wars sequels.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago

Why doesn't this surprise me? A media conglomerate buying a media rating website so it can control the stats.

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I use letterboxd for movies

Serializd for shows

Storygraph for books.

All owned by individuals as far as I know.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Doctorow is never wrong.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been using Tastedive which recommends movies, music and tv based on what you've watched before, I've found it much more reliable than reviews and scores.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

So that's why their critic reviews are like that

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I always knew it might have been rotten!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

No wonder their taste is trash

load more comments
view more: next ›