this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
714 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3254 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Imagine if Linux developers building the libraries this was built on where as petty.

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

Lmao welcome to the world of open source

Project doesn't have an issue tracker, wonder why

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know who the bad guy is here because closing the source a while back makes me distrust this dev yet also I 100% believe Linux users (or at least the power users) are almost certainly insufferable in ways that would drive a reasonable dev out of development for Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Imagine if Linux developers building the libraries this was built on where as petty.

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Petty is pretty harsh and reading this message I wish I'd paused and chosen a better word.

That said, the way the commit reads, the relicensing, the fact they seem to be upset the aur is locked to the GPL version to comply with the license but also poisoning the build scripts like it's somehow going to affect the old GPL code. It just does not sound like someone acting in good faith with the open source community they're clearly building on top of and that does rub me the wrong way.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

So what other ps1/2 emulators are on Linux yall would recommend. I don't wanna support this dev

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Were you supporting him before?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Linux users are entitled children? Perish the thought.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is so lame for the arch community, like I use arch btws are supposed to be the most hardcore power users and they bugged a dev that badly! I don't know how many tutorial I saw about compiling arch and building everything yourself into a minimal setup.

You can't give me shit for using Manjaro for as long as I did, GLAD I LEFT.

can I say something a little stupidThx!

So I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with ignoring emails. Emails are a kinda public way for anyone to start a conversation with you. As developers, we include our emails in commits — but we don’t have to. I don’t think GitHub even checks whether the email addresses in commits are valid.

So yeah, if you have a valid reason to reach out to a developer, go ahead. But if that developer disagrees or doesn’t want to respond, that’s just how it is — you can’t make someone email you back.

I’m just being consistent with myself. I always tell my friends and family about the importance of the block button, and I’ll say the same thing here: just ignore it. And in this case someone would have eventually fixed the problem and submitted a PR.

~sry if I was condescending~

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most arch users are casuals that finally figured out how to read a manual. Then you have the 1% of arch users who are writing the manual…

It’s the Gentoo and BSD users we should fear and respect, walking quietly with a big stick of competence.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As a 10 year Arch user* I concur. Reports of danger are vastly exaggerated. Most software comes pre-compiled and tested. I never had any more (or less) problems than with Debian stable.

Newcomers often underestimate the importance of its wiki, and some are perpetually unwilling to understand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don’t know how many tutorial I saw about compiling arch

2 things wrong with that:

  • No end user compiles ArchLinux from source
  • One of the first things you're told when using ArchLinux is to peruse the Wiki, not "many tutorial"

You don't know what you're talking about.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But then someone else would have to maintain it for Linux, and Arch Linux specifically. That's a lot of work, especially as things diverge from the features intended for an emulator (/s)

[–] JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok. Back to Mednafen I guess.

Back to Mednafen I guess.

[–] hisao@ani.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sad news. This is the only PSX emu I've ever used because I always considered it the best.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I don't know, the PSX is old and well understood enough now that in my head it's in the bundle of "just do Retroarch" systems along with all the 8 and 16 bit stuff.

I don't even remember what core I usually run for it. They're all at least serviceable to great.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›