They must have interviewed idiots
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I think only extremely expensive luxury models being available is keeping Americans from buying EVs. Like where are the cheap, dependable small cars, like in other countries!?
Seriously! Give me a Honda Fit sized electric hatchback that uses a modern charging standard (so not the Leaf).
I have a Honda Fit and it is the best car I've ever owned. If Honda came up with a Fit EV (again), I would probably buy it right away.
I've got an older (2006) Accord. I like it, but it's 19 years old with 260k miles, and it's just starting to have some rust issues. It's getting to the point where repairs are almost not worth the cost. An electric Fit (or similar) might be enough for me to shell out for a new car instead of another 10+ year old car.
I'd love an electric fit at a reasonable price point
Is this not the Chevy Bolt? Sure productions been on hiatus, but a late model used one is a pretty good price.
" For now, BYD and other Chinese EVs are virtually locked out of the US market due to tariffs."
And "safety concerns." Some are legit but in context, are probably safer than Teslas. The Chinese EV makers just need to buy more politicians.
In Aus , we have pretty strict safety over cars, the cybertruck will never be allowed on our roads due to safety issues, most of the byd range is currently available, and they are great cars! So, in this instance most likely def safer then at least 1 Tesla 😂
Yup. I hate Teslas, not EVs in general, but I also hate the pricing of them.
Are you only considering buying new? A ‘23 Chevy Bolt from carvana is about $16k
Are you sure it's not that North American EVs are fucking awful and expensive? And that foreign ones have artificial restrictions to prop up the out-of-touch NA manufacturers?
Yeah, the options for EV in the US are pretty horrible, and it's mainly because US manufacturers want to have their cake and eat it as well. They don't want to invest in EV manufacturing, which imo is fine. We shouldn't have to prod corporations into remaining relevant. However, they are also spending millions of dollars lobbying the government into protecting their market from competitors and into overturning climate initiatives.
We won't ever see these corporations invest in EV until an outside player forces their hands. Amazing how quickly the faux love of Free market economics became a thing of the past the moment there's an actual threat of competition.
Best case scenario imo is that America car manufacturers shit the bed so hard that Americans actually begin to start to care about public transportation. Trains are the most effective and efficient mode of transportation and always have been, ev are just a band-aid.
Knowing charge infrastructure isn't expanding and won't be maintained doesn't help
Once again, this time everybody join in, "electric cars aren't here to save the planet they're here to save the car industry."
Electric vehicles don't really solve any of the problems that cars have. They just shift the resource and environmental problems into a different arena.
It seems to me that the most effective way of dealing with personal vehicles is to use renewable power to produce gasoline (Blue crude).
That way your gasoline is carbon neutral or even carbon negative until you burn it, can actually be kept sterile and separate and only mixed on demand so it doesn't go bad, and never has any sulfur in it because it's made from scratch.
It also means that all of the vehicles that currently exist can still be used which would dramatically reduce the amount of energy necessary to keep a functional fleet of vehicles and doesn't need everything to be replaced including the infrastructure.
Peaker plants could be built to soak up all of the extra renewable power when production is so much higher than demand so there's no need to worry about where you get the power to do this.
There are solutions out here but they require a kind of rearrangement of how we do business at almost every level.
Electric cars are so much more efficient than gas cars that I can't see how "Blue Crude" could ever get even close in terms of emissions. Electric cars are so efficient that if you converted the size of their batteries to gallons of gas, most of them would have a tank smaller than 4 gallons. Why would we keep using such inefficient engines just to try and recapture that carbon out of the atmosphere when we could just never emit it in the first place?
Norway, where I live, have invested a lot in the charging infrastructure since 2010. In 2024 9/10 cars registered were electric.
This far into the year, and the amount of newly registered electric cars is 94,1%. Tesla is 17% of the sales, they're having a very good financing campaign on the new model Y. VW is second with 14%.
In countries where the infrastructure is good, a decent car with long range and is "cheap" is king.
I would love to have an electric vehicle. But first, I'd need to live somewhere with an appropriate power outlet near a reliable parking space.
I'm an apartment dweller that is lucky to find parking in front of my own home on Friday nights (when there are always more cars than usual.) I can only imagine how many people are in the same situation. Meanwhile, with the housing situation as it is, our ability to move to affordable houses (which could provide such power outlets) dwindles more every day. In this way, creating more affordable housing could lead more people to drive electric vehicles, simply by removing the barriers currently preventing them from doing so.
Hmmm. It's almost like multiple facets of society... intersect somehow. Like if we were to improve one aspect, it could have a ripple effect that benefits other parts. So weird, right? Who would'a thunk it.
We're seeing that in England.
There are commercial charging stations here and there in our neighborhood, but most people live in tarraced houses (in US terms, row houses) with unreserved resident's parking on the streets. Our house is at the end of the row and has a big enough back garden to include a parking space, but that's an exception. So now the council has offered to cut channels in the sidewalk from each house to the street so that charging cables can be run without impeding pedestrian access.
It still doesn't solve the problem of being sure you can park in front of the house, but it's a step in the right direction.
If US liberals can't see the difference between Tesla cars and any old EVs, fuck US liberals quite frankly.
But I doubt it. If anybody is killing EVs in the US, it's Donald "What Epstein files?" Trump.
The theory put forth here doesn’t make a lot of sense. Are we sure left leaning people aren’t just becoming more anti-car in general?
For me, 5 years ago, buying an EV seemed like a great idea, albeit one I couldn’t really afford. But then I realized I could just reduce my driving by 90% and achieve the same benefit while saving money. So I don’t really need an EV anymore now that I barely ever drive.
hell yeah, public transport is better than any car of any type, be it combustion or EVs.
I own two "EVs." They're bicycles.
Fuck yeah e-bikes are great.
It's such a beautiful confluence of technologies
Elon Musk is turning US liberals off not just Tesla but billionaires in general
FTFY
EVs were always a distraction from our lack of public transportation.
Also, Tesla was redesigned after Musk bought it as a company to suck up green energy subidies to sell luxury cars at a premium instead of offering any real solutions.
He's also turning us off in general
Uh, no? I want an EV, though I want a small one that has a light touch on the environment. It's true that I don't want one that's from a Nazi wannabe, but I do want an EV that has decent range and can transport my wife and me for daily tasks. But maybe I don't catch the attention of US EV makers because I'd rather an e-bike than an E-SUV?
Are they buying cargo bikes and lobbying for public transport improvements, or is this the stupidest timeline and we’re going to see liberals rolling coal in their diesel SUVs because fuck Elon?
I'm probably one of these. was thinking EV but now did a 180 and am going to get a big old gas or diesel truck off craigslist.
the upside is I drive maybe once a week and bike and scooter otherwise so my carbon impact will still be low. it's just to haul wood for woodworking or take my trailer to the campsite.
another upside by getting it used and fixing it up is reducing waste and avoiding a car payment. most EVs are still new enough you're unlikely to be able to buy them used cheaply. I can get a used usable truck for under 5 grand cash.
Build trains and bike lanes.
I'm still waiting for an EV minivan. And also ya know having the spare money which is a lot less under this admin because there's more uncertainty in everything and less regulation against exploitation.
the ID Buzz is really interesting to me, but just doesn't have the range. Ofc it's pricey as well.
I just want an electric pickup. Used Rivians are around $55k on Carvana. Used Mavericks are $25k.