His opponents are a crook, a sex pest, a Republican, and a guy nobody has heard of. That ought to be an easy win in NYC.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
590 points (99.8% liked)
politics
25032 readers
2379 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I’m more surprised that the crook, sex pest, and Republican are three different people.
You’d like to think but those also sounds like a section of NYC.
It is funny these articles that are shocked that somehow the not a total piece of shit is massively popular.
You seem to be repeating yourself. No need to say it three times. Just say "Republican."
You would think so, but considering the last presidential election.....
Never underestimate the ability of the Democratic leadership to sabotage an easy win.
“Ought to” and “hopefully will” be, but those other candidates are exactly who keeps winning in our timeline.
I'd be OK with more guys nobody has heard of winning elections.
What sealed the deal for me? When CNN asked him if he likes capitalism and he said "no".
I'm a Democratic Strategist and you can be SURE I'm taking NOTES! The REASON is that he DOESNT have a Billionaire Sex Offender running AGAINST him! Only MILLIONARE Sex Offenders! IF we can find a BILLIONAIRE Sex Offender to Run we can BEAT Mamdani! RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!
-DNC Strategists!
No no, it must be his social media game. Maybe we should try cursing more?
- a competing DNC strategist
"We need a moderate candidate" soundbite spewers in shambles
This is the moderate candidate. The actual "radical" choice would be someone who favors actual Socialism and abolish private property. Mamdani only seeks Social Democracy (even tho he calls it "Democratic Socialism"), which is very moderate in my view.
He was also in favor of defunding the police in 2020, but he had to backtrack from it because it's unpopular. So I think his current platform is the compromise.
I don't think the older generations will ever realize this
The Red Scare ruined an entire generation's perception of a fair society.
He was also in favor of defunding the police in 2020
He's still advocating that, just stealthily without saying those specific words. "We need social workers to deal with mental health crises and non-violent 911 calls" is basically defunding the police without the stigma.
Democratic socialism is by definition reformist and non-revolutionary.
Whether you agree with the methods or not purity testing a popular progressive candidate over something so minor is just outrageously self defeating.
We should probably write our democratic senators and state if the try to fuck him over they're gonna loose a lot of voters, because they usually can't smell the shit on their knees. They will cause the Republicans to win.
Even though when polled most said they would vote for no other candidate.
DNC bosses: “somehow he’s reaching the younger voters. Is it his policy platform?” “No, impossible”
DNC IRL
DNC working hard to ensure this guy never wins as we speak
Vote NYC!
Zohran "Self Ascribed Socialist" Mamdani
The geriatric is the obvious choice.
wtaf.
Mamdani does top out at numbers that were inconceivable just months ago; he does top out at around 40 percent. The moderate turnout is a key factor, as well as if college students are willing to come out in record numbers like they did in the primary.
I find it hard to imagine that people motivated enough to vote in a primary would neglect to vote in the larger race it leads to. Barring any election fuckery (which I'm sure will be attempted), this should bode well.
I think that's just alluding to the narrative that "Leftists don't show up to vote". It was always a bullshit narrative, but that never stopped people from using it.
Here's hoping. I think it's time to see what some 'self-described socialists' can do against the donkey pee vs elephant dung contest.
Keep it up!