this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

News

31365 readers
2215 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 65 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Next headline at the end of this quarter:

"Procter and Gamble sees record profits for the billionth year in a row!"

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Exactly. The supply chains of a company like that are incredibly opaque, even if it's a publicly traded company. How are we, the consumers, to know what a fair tariff price offset is?

It's one thing if the product is made entirely in one country and imported whole by a seller. Someone in China makes a widget out of entirely Chinese parts, packages it in a China-made box, and sends it to the US, ready for store shelves? Well if the tariff goes up by 25%, no reasonable person could fault the import seller of that product for raising their prices by 25%.

But a big consumer company like P&G? They're a multinational conglomerate. Even simple products like clothes detergent may have a dozen different ingredients from a dozen different countries. Some of those compounds have to go back and forth across borders multiple times as they go through various stages of chemical refining. And the tariffs the chemical precursors will be hit with may vary based on the chemical involved. It's hard for the company itself to estimate what the fair break-even amount they should raise prices by to offset tariffs. What hope does the average consumer have?

So companies, being heartless monsters, see an obvious opportunity. Maybe after a thorough analysis of their supply chain by people with very fancy credentials, they conclude that they need to raise prices by 17% to evenly offset the tariffs. That's the fair number; that's just what's needed to break even. But it took a whole team of business and logistics experts to come up with that number. No consumer will be able to check their work. So...what's to stop them from using this as a chance to reap some profit? Tell customers that you need to raise prices by 25%. How will they know the difference?

And this is how you end up with corporations making record profits. Supply chains are too complex for consumers to determine what a fair price increase is to offset tariffs. So companies can figure out that fair number, add some additional profit margin to it, and just blame it all on the tariffs. Never let a good crisis go to waste!

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even if they didn't have to, it's a good time to raise prices. Just like the COVID times, evergreen container, inflation or whatever they eventually blame it on.

Prices never return to normal when the crisis is over

[–] SpoonyBard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

When the goal of every CEO in late stage capitalism is to beat last quarters profits by a large percentage, pocket a giant bonus to themselves, leave the company for another company and repeat.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what ingredients in detergent, toothpaste, and deodorant, can’t be sourced locally?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cheap, existing labor and infrastructure?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget nonexistent environmental laws that allow for chemical plants to operate with "better margins"

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

They’re working on it though…

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Do you think these companies can just snap their fingers and suddenly start producing stuff locally?

And even if they could, why would they? In three years another guy comes in the White House and the tariffs are gone. Also why would they produce locally when they could just raise prices and shift the expense to the consumers, maybe a bit more so they can even get a little extra.

Also what are you gonna do about it? Get your toothpaste from a different company? Good one, they bought out all the others and the ones they didn't buy out are just gonna rise prices too because they're not gonna leave money on the table. Don't you love unregulated capitalism?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I love late stage capitalism myself. Having the products of our sweet sweet labor go to somebody else so they can buy a bigger second yacht is just peak humanity. Record profits for the suits and nothing for the plebs breaking their backs is just human nature...

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On top of all that, increasing prices is also a great way to boost inflation.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

God I am so full of greed right now for our proletariat slave masters! My cup runneth over with compassion for them.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

are they doing this after cutting profit down to zero?

[–] littletoolshed@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whoa, whoa, whoa, stop changing the subject! We’re talking about COSTS here, bucko! Somebody’s gotta pay!

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

😂 I guess shareholders gotta eat too. (eat shit.)

[–] PMmeTrebuchets@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

I already don't buy from them since they're usually too expensive and I guess I will continue to not buy from them, bc this is just greedy, but tariffs are such a nice, convenient excuse.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Can't believe inelastic goods producers would do this.