this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
170 points (94.3% liked)

News

31365 readers
2315 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The title is a bit clickbaity but that’s the only story on this I could find and according to the rules, post needs to match the article’s title. Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 76 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A lot of peope in these comments are oddly confused about this article, probably because the headline is worded intentionally poorly.

This is a whistleblower revealing that the administration really did edit a minute out of the video and then lied about it normally missing a minute every day, and that this lie can be exposed because the original, unedited video contains the missing footage.

The whistleblower's claim is challenging the official goverment word on this. This isn't the government trying to Jedi mindtrick you, like how CBS wanted the headline to read.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 70 points 4 days ago (4 children)

These goofy mfers really trying to jedi mind trick people now?

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it -Joseph Goebbels, minister of propaganda for the Nazi German government of the Third Reich

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

No. This article is about a source who claims the government have a copy without the missing minute.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

No, just CBS news... this article is about a whistleblower calling the government out on its lie.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The metadata says otherwise.

I personally am not going to take the word of Pam Bondi and some anonymous government insiders on this one.

If the footage wasn't edited than this complete footage can also be independently verified by digital forensics. Until then there's no evidence to back up this claim.

Right now all we have is an unverified claim by CBS (Capitulation Broadcasting Systems) that just so happens to corroborate a Trump spokesman.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Couldn’t even read the short summary…

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dead link? Not sure what you mean there. Here's the important parts of the link I provided.

On Friday, WIRED published an analysis of metadata embedded in the video, confirmed by independent video forensics experts, which indicates that the file was assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as “raw” footage.

WIRED’s initial analysis found that those saves took place over a 23-minute span; however, further analysis of additional metadata shows the file was actually edited and saved several times over a period of more than three and a half hours on May 23, 2025. Specifically, the file was created at 4:48 pm and last modified at 8:16 pm ET that day. The metadata also references “MJCOLE~1,” which is likely a shortened version of a longer username. While it likely begins with “MJCOLE,” the full name cannot be determined from the metadata alone.

Both analyses found that the two clips, labeled “2025-05-22 16-35-21.mp4” and “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” were stitched together. The first clip is 4 hours, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds long, but only the first 4 hours, 16 minutes, and 23.368 seconds appears in the published version, meaning nearly 2 minutes and 53 seconds were cut from the end. According to the metadata, the cut occurs just at 11:58:58 pm. The cut is milliseconds before the one-minute recording gap that Bondi said was caused by a quirk of the surveillance system. The second clip, “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” picks up immediately afterward, continuing the footage from 12:00:00 am until 6:40:00 am.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Here's the relevant part of the summary that they're saying you didn't read.

Anyways, they are claiming that the government is in possession of the full video with the minute intact, not that the footage posted wasn’t missing a minute

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Right, that's exactly what this government source is saying. They're a whistleblower confirming that the video that was released was edited because the government has the original video that includes the missing footage

A government source familiar with the investigation says the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice inspector general are all in possession of a copy of the video that does not cut from just before 11:59 p.m. to midnight of the night Epstein died by suicide in his cell.

Lol downvoting me because you didn't read.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A government source familiar with the investigation says the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice inspector general are all in possession of a copy of the video that does not cut from just before 11:59 p.m. to midnight of the night Epstein died by suicide in his cell.

Well when that footage is released and independently verified than we'll have something to talk about.

Considering CBS just capitulated to Trump I'm not going to trust their anonymous sources. Especially if they're corroborating any Trump spokesman.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So even though the footage previously release has been verified to be edited... you're just gonna believe that this allegedly complete footage exists... based on a CBS article with zero citations?

https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-video-had-nearly-3-minutes-cut-out/

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're completely misunderstanding. The CBS source is confirming the non-edited version exists.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think this person is not misunderstanding at this point but using a very bizarre and unsuccessful strategy to attempt to save face after being correctly called out for not reading the article lol

EDIT: LOL they've gone through my comment history and downvoted all of my comments...

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I read further down after posting that. Whooo boy.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So even though the footage previously release has been verified to be edited... you're just gonna believe that this allegedly complete footage exists...

It had to be edited from something...?

Right now all we have is an unverified claim by CBS (Capitulation Broadcasting Systems) that just so happens to corroborate a Trump spokesman.

Huh?? This does not corroborate a Trump spokesman, it's literally the opposite. Can you explain what made you think it corroborates a Trump spokesman?

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first analysis that I saw clocked the actual missing time as roughly 2:50 if I recall correctly, and this was when news first hit about there being a 'magic minute' when the system turns over during the AM hours. This is pretty typical for the FBI, not just lying, but doing a poor job of it and telling everyone who balks at their shit excuses to get fucked instead of furnishing actual credible evidence.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Even if it's true that the recording software's clock always skips a minute at midnight... the footage wouldn't be split up at that point.

There's literally no reason for that footage to have been spliced the number of times that the metadata shows it was.

They could prove themselves by simply releasing the raw footage without the edits. Wonder why they don't.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bingo, it was a poor excuse for a poorly implemented security system (in a fucking prison of all places), and turned out to only serve as further obfuscation for additional problems with their story.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I've re-read the original article like 30 times now.

It's bonkers to me that people are so quick to trust this unverified claim the complete footage (without Epstein getting murdered) exists when the footage already released has been proven to be doctored.

Like if this is legit than the footage needs to be released and verified by 3rd parties.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There was never a “Black President”, a US government source says.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 4 days ago

George W. Bush was always the 44th President, and Jefferson Davis was always recognised as a President.

[–] salty_chief@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

He wasn’t black but an African American. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A government source familiar with the investigation says the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons and the Department of Justice inspector general are all in possession of a copy of the video that does not cut from just before 11:59 p.m. to midnight of the night Epstein died by suicide in his cell.

What is unclear is why that section was missing when the FBI released what it said was raw footage from inside the Special Housing Unit the night Epstein died, Aug. 9-10, 2019

It's actually pretty fucking clear.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 4 days ago

This is technically right.

It was actually missing closer to 3.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Cause now they could generate the missing part with easy to use ai tools. Or what?

wait.. Trump is gonna post a tweet showing Obama sneaking in there during the missing minutes?

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

They’re just gonna throw in an AI generated minute. Last I read there were 3 minutes missing.

[–] tylerkdurdan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

CBS now stands for Conservative BullShit.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I, for one, trust a felon rapist thief traitor pedo's government.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Every commenter before me only read the headline and misunderstood it.

You should try reading at least the post's body, but maybe branch out and read the article as well.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That their copy isn't missing time but the "unedited" released copy is? I dont see how that's any better. Why just cut a (few) minute(s) out if they aren't trying to hide something?

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

It isn't better, just stupider!

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I didn't say anything was better than any other thing. I only remarked that people were commenting on a misunderstanding of the headline alone, clearly not even having read the body. Their comments make no sense otherwise.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thought the same thing. And so many upvotes, too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

“Nuh-uh” -Government

load more comments
view more: next ›