this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

3007 readers
27 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

With 0 replaceable parts? Battery built into the frame? That is trash.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are they actually non-replaceable? Most of the bikes that I've seen like this either have the battery come out of the front (behind the bike's badge, you just side the whole thing out) or out from the bottom bracket (there's a hatch by the cranks).

Also the brakes, cranks, chain, pedals, seat, post, handlebars, brakes, fork... pretty much everything looks replaceable. They look mostly like standard parts to me.

Where are you getting the 0 replaceable parts?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Is this is really just a rendering, who knows? But yes, those parts might be standard. I was talking more about the E-side of that bike, where every bit of locked down hard- and software simply make this waste after a few years.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These look like Renderings I imagine actual model will have a snap in battery, because welding a frame, or carbon fiber closeout, with a battery inside is next level Apple bike. 2 years and you need ebike2pro

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

That would be really expensive and there would be no discernible benefit that I can think of.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

The integrated battery is a bummer, but the rest of the bike looks like it uses normal bike parts, so not sure what you mean there.

Honestly, other than the battery tech this bike seems kinda lacklustre and overpriced. A fast-charging commuter bike with no fenders, racks, or lights? Ouch.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No mention of range, which could be the deal-breaker.

If you're getting decent range, then 15-minute charging really isn't wanted/needed.

This might be good for people who do food delivery, but the bike itself isn't designed to be used like that...

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They probably don't mention range because it's not possible to know, particularly with bleeding edge battery tech, without a pre-production run and testing. Although I wouldn't expect it to be shorter than typical ebike distance. Solid-state batteries promise really good energy density. Also short range at a $3k price tag would be a very hard sell.

Fast charging would be useful in touring and bikepacking; a lunch stop becomes a fresh battery. Already the one-wheel community run rides where they adapt car chargers to outlets mid-ride for their group's one-wheels.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fast charging would be useful in touring and bikepacking;

I agree, but THIS bike is not it! It doesn't even have fork mounts or rack mounts from what I can see. Who is this bike actually for?

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This bike doesn't exist yet. The pictures are renders and for marketing, like this article. Heck, maybe that's why there's a press release. They're getting public feedback without locking in specific design details.

Given they have Gary Fisher onboard, I'd be very surprised if they launch without any method to mount accessories.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But they are talking money now! LOL

Given they have Gary Fisher onboard, I’d be very surprised if they launch without any method to mount accessories.

Gary is the only reason why this bike is making headlines. The charging thing isn't really a pull if the rest of the bike has no mass appeal.

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I completely agree. A fool and their money are soon parted. :)

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The bike is also just 13kg, you can switch the assist to the lowest and just treat it as a normal bike.

Edit: also the battery is 350wh, assuming the rider ride it in a way that the motor consuming averaging around 150w and around 25kmph, that would likely net you around 50km, or even more, depend on the assist level.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd love to see a breakdown of the weight of the motor, battery, and frame on its own. Many carbon-framed bikes are around 20 pounds, so the fact that this one is only 10 pounds more and still has to account for everything else makes me very suspicious as to where corners were cut and if the specs are actually true.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, for now we can only work on assumption, and i doubt the weight could be kept under just that for a 350wh battery. But realistically it would still be under 15kg if they use light weight mid drive