this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
103 points (97.2% liked)

News

31475 readers
2913 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the legal filings — and on social media — Trump says he personally told media mogul Rupert Murdoch that the racy birthday greeting he had supposedly sent two decades earlier to the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein had been faked and did not exist. Murdoch's Journal reported it anyway, despite Trump's warning.

Now, Trump is asking a federal judge in Miami to compel the man he once called "my very good friend Rupert Murdoch" to answer his lawyers' questions under oath within 15 days of the order. Trump's legal team acknowledges that the ink is barely dry on the lawsuit — there is no schedule of court deadlines yet — but argues that Murdoch is unlikely to testify in person whenever a trial occurs due to his advanced age and health issues.

"Murdoch is 94 years old, has suffered from multiple health issues throughout his life, is believed to have suffered recent significant health scares, and is presumed to live in New York, New York," the filing states. "Taken together, these factors weigh heavily in determining that Murdoch would be unavailable for in-person testimony at trial."

The filing repeatedly stresses Murdoch's age and cites health setbacks, including a reported collapse during a breakfast in London in 2023 with the chief executive of his British holdings, Rebekah Brooks. The judge has ordered Murdoch — the only person Trump asked to be compelled to submit to an accelerated deposition — to respond by the end of Monday.

"The way it's being framed is almost sarcastic," says Joseph Azam, a former senior vice president and legal executive for Murdoch's newspaper and publishing empire. "It's classic Trump. He is using lawfare, to use his own term, to silence people.

"The problem is he's going after people who are equally equipped — and in some ways, I would say, better equipped — to navigate this stuff," Azam tells NPR. The unusual demand to seek an urgent deposition of Rupert Murdoch — and only Rupert Murdoch — feels like "a gratuitous attempt to poke the bear," Azam says.

This lawsuit is definitely a distraction, a waste of an incomprehensible amount of money and legal resources (definitely being paid for with our tax dollars), and amounts to a passive aggressive cat fight between two horrible old men with way too much money. But, "a gratuitous attempt to poke the bear" is also Trump's entire personality, and why we're watching him flounder while trying to get people to forget the issue he promised to expose.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If Rupert Fucking Murdoch brings down the regime he built and gets lauded for his principals im going to burn this whole country down because obviously im in a simulation and there are no consequences

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Seriously, that is something that is really disturbing to me right now.

I 100% support calling out the guilty parties that have been named so far, but the people doing it are trying so hard to make themselves out to be the good guys when they deserve to go down with him.

Mike Johnson getting a huge Thiel donation that he then disbursed to other House Republicans. Fucking Massie and Khanna have both received donations from Thiel. Massie and that fucking Uranium mine Thiel is coincidentally opening in KY!? Give me a fucking break!

Then they're acting like a subpoena for who the media keeps referring to as simply "Epstein's estate" (they're his co-conspirators Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, who helped him get away with trafficking and abusing his victims) will allow them to have access to this book and "reveal the truth." The same book that Murdoch somehow had access to after Vance just happened to pay him an unscheduled visit a few weeks ago..

They've asked for an unredacted copy, so on the word of two men who got away with helping Epstein, we're supposed to believe whatever evidence they give is completely unredacted, and they want to put it in the fucking Smithsonian to document whatever history they're trying to create.

Meanwhile, hardly any coverage or mention of Epstein's estate receiving hundreds of millions on the investments Epstein made in Thiel's company other than that one NYT article that exposed it in early June.

Fuuuuck these people. All of them. Trump, Murdoch, Thiel, Vance, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Indyke, Kahn, Maxwell, Massie, Kahnna, Mike Johnson, and anyone else I'm leaving out (bc I know there's way more attached to Epstein, Thiel money, or both) At best they're all complicit. All of them!

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Agreed.

I do hope he drops the hammer though.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never expected the Murdoch character to potentially have a redemption arc so late in his tenure, but it could be in the writing this season. The question is, if he does begin opening the closets and dragging out skeletons, will he have the character and new insight to drag out his own as well?

This is the weirdest season of the House of Lards ever. The twists are great and I hope we see more.

I figured you just meant Succession

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Murdoch is 94 years old, has suffered from multiple health issues throughout his life, is believed to have suffered recent significant health scares, and is presumed to live in New York, New York

Why don't you bring the court to him then and file in New York?

Oh what's that? You won't have preferential treatment? And the AG absolutely HATES you? Sucks

[–] floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

“Turns personal”‽‽‽‽

When was this $10 billion lawsuit over hurting Trump‘s feefees anything other than personal?

It’s not “news” when it extraordinarily fucking obvious everyone

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fee fees are for little girls. This is about honor among men.

When it comes to exposing each other's pedophelia preferences, it's personal!

This is my favorite part of the article:

"The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist," Trump wrote.