We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
This is what happens when you apply maths without regard to meaning. Perfect example of the adage "Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to put tomatoes in a fruit salad."
Hofstadter and Emanuel's Surfaces and Essences explores the idea of categorisation in a more serious way.
I stopped at the line where they said
"This is actually a pretty strange definition. It includes things like a plate of mixed nuts, but excludes a caesar salad which you stuck in the microwave for two minutes."
Anyone who puts lettuce in a microwave is an abomination - you will end up with a slurry of slimy fibre and some hot water. I'd rather eat pond scum.
lol I believe that's the point! It stops being edible, and therefore, stops being a salad.
I could be wrong but I think you've misread it. In context they're saying it's crazy to exclude a microwaved caesar salad (the section about hot vs cold). I.e they think a microwaved salad SHOULD be included.
Now realistically what I assume they meant was microwaving the chicken before putting it in the caesar shouldn't make it not a salad (fair enough) but it's not what they actually said.
Edit to paste in the full section
"This is actually a pretty strange definition. It includes things like a plate of mixed nuts, but excludes a caesar salad which you stuck in the microwave for two minutes.
While people might object to serving a hot salad, it certainly seems bizarre and objectionable to exclude it from the definition simply based on temperature.
We conclude that this definition does not meet the necessary rigor for a proper salad definition, "
Chicken soup is obviously a salad
Think I just found my new icebreaker
The problem here is the assumption that modifiers can be safely ignored.
In the same way that veggie chicken is, obviously, not chicken, a bowl full of potatoes and mayonnaise is not a salad. It is a potato salad, and the word "potato" is doing too much heavy lifting to omit.
If I asked someone to get me a salad, and they came back with a potato salad, I'd assume they were pranking me.
This is why dictionaries list multiple definitions for words.
Mayonnaise and potatoes are called potato salad? Is that some US thing? Where I am from, a potato salad is sliced cooked potatoes, onions, salt, sunflower oil and some vinegar. Much closer to a salad that than mayonnaise abomination.
salt, sunflower oil and some vinegar
I mean, add an egg to that and you have mayo.
France : I'd call cubed potatoes in mayonnaise a salad. A proper potato salad would have sliced pickles and diced ham, but still.
Maybe so? I mean, I'm exaggerating a little, but those are the two primary ingredients of most of these non-salad "salads" that I would find in a typical diner or supermarket.
Potato salad, egg salad, macaroni salad, and tuna salad are fundamentally mayonnaise, potato/egg/macaroni/tuna, and spices. Probably some chopped onion and herbs as well. They are often nearly-homogenous glop.
I'm sure there are less offensive ways of making these things, and perhaps I would actually consider some of them "salads". But yes, the glop I described is commonly called "____ salad". I don't think it would be reasonable to call them "salads" with no qualifier. These are compound phrases, and it's best not to get stuck on the etymology.
You can also call a poorly-written headline "word salad". And yet if I ordered a salad and got a copy of the New York Post, I would be very confused indeed.
Is it right to call this a theory?
A theory must be able to make predictions, is this not more of an interpretation?
In his book Rationality, Steven Pinker says that the way we mentality categorize things is not by a strict definition, but with a number of properties that make things more it less like the category. So it's like, if it has green vegetables, it's more likely to be a salad, if it's served hot is less likely, etc. This avoids issues like this where trying to strictly define things leads to absurd results. I think he even used salad as an example in the book.
Absurd results like saying Pluto isn't a planet! /s ... kinda'
I'm rather surprised that ingredient entropy did not account for continuity of the ingredients. Having too high continuity would end up in "not salads" (hamburgers, pizza, sandwich) whilst too low would put you into puré, sauce and definitely soup/beverage territory. Whilst there is a subset of soups/beverages/salads that have a similar degree of soupiness, outside of that subset you'll find degrees of soupiness that are undisputably not soup and undisputably not salad.
Solid Content
A salad must be mostly composed of solid content.
This definition sounds reasonable, but it turns out the devil is in the details of how you define “mostly”. At what point have you poured in so much balsamic vinaigrette that something stops being a salad?
R: 40% by volume. At this point it's no longer a salad, it's vinaigrette, a subset of soup.
I used to adamantly link this to people mentioning the cube theory whenever it came up because people blindly follow it as law and assume it is correct just because it has a github repo. I eventually gave up because I can't tell if people think Cube Theory is just funny or actually legit anymore.