this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

4706 readers
490 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Beijing (AFP) – China's government will offer subsidies to parents to the tune of $500 per child under the age of three per year, Beijing's state media said Monday, as the world's second most populous nation faces a looming demographic crisis.

The country's population has declined for three consecutive years, with United Nations demography models predicting it could fall from 1.4 billion today to 800 million by 2100.

The nationwide subsidies apply retroactively from January 1, Beijing's state broadcaster CCTV said, citing a decision by the ruling Communist Party and the State Council, China's cabinet.

"This is a major nationwide policy aimed at improving public wellbeing," CCTV said.

"It provides direct cash subsidies to families across the country, helping to reduce the burden of raising children," it added.

There were just 9.54 million births in China last year, half the number than in 2016, the year it ended its one-child policy, which was in place for more than three decades.

The population declined by 1.39 million last year, and China lost its crown as the world's most populous country to India in 2023.

Marriage rates are also at record low levels, with many young couples put off having babies by high child-rearing costs and career concerns.

Parents in Beijing welcomed the fresh subsidies, but said more needed to be offered for them to consider having extra children.

"For young couples who just got married and already have a baby, it might actually encourage them to consider having a second child," Wang Xue, a mother to a nine-year-old son, told AFP.

"After all, the subsidy does help ease their burdens... and also offers some psychological comfort," Wang said.

But she said the new measures would not be enough to convince her to have a second child.

"Having one child is manageable, but if I had two, I might feel a bit of (financial) pressure," the 36-year-old told AFP.

Zhang Wei, a 34-year-old father of a daughter and son, said the new subsidies were "a good start" because raising children was getting more expensive.

"Compared to our generation, the costs have definitely increased exponentially," he said.

While analysts said the subsidies were a step in the right direction, they warned that the new measures alone would not reverse China's population decline, nor boost its domestic spending slump.

"It is encouraging that the government finally moved to use fiscal subsidies to boost fertility," said Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management.

It also showed the government recognised the "serious challenge" that low fertility rates posed for the economy, Zhang added.

Zichun Huang, China economist at Capital Economics, said the policy marked a "major milestone" in terms of direct handouts to households and could lay the groundwork for more fiscal transfers in the future.

But he said the sums were too small to have a "near-term impact on the birth rate or consumption".

Many local governments have already rolled out subsidies to encourage childbirth.

In March, Hohhot, the capital of China's northern Inner Mongolia region, began offering residents up to 100,000 yuan ($14,000) per newborn for couples with three or more children, while first and second children will be eligible for 10,000 and 50,000 yuan subsidies.

In Shenyang, in northeastern Liaoning province, local authorities give families who have a third child 500 yuan per month until the child turns three.

More than 20 provincial-level administrations in the country now offer childcare subsidies, according to official data.

Premier Li Qiang vowed to provide childcare subsidies during the government's annual work report in March.

China's shrinking population is also ageing fast, sparking worries about the future of the country's pension system.

There were nearly 310 million people aged 60 and over in 2024.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

1.4 Billion just isn’t enough huh

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

That's not really the issue. They're going to face a demographic collapse like is happening in SK, JP, and to soon be followed by the west.

I'm all for some degrowth, but it's going to be disastrous if not managed properly.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Global populations need to fall further and faster before stabilizing at a sustainable level, commensurate with consumption levels.

Stabilizing the population now is condeming your children to a world that can't accomodate them. There are severe consequences for exceeding planetary boundaries as we are all about to find out.

The burden we are willing to place on current and all future generations for the comfort and convenience of the aged is evil.

If you are young, don't have children. They will resent you for bringing them into this rapidly collapsing distopia.

If you are old, plan for a graceful exit before you burden everyone.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago