this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
748 points (99.7% liked)

politics

25045 readers
2070 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Markwayne Mullin tried to blame former President Barack Obama for Jeffrey Epstein‘s 2008 plea deal, despite Obama not being president at the time.

Mullin made the comments while being interviewed by Jake Tapper on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday. First, Tapper and Mullin debated over whether the attorney general has the ability to release documents related to the Epstein investigation, with Mullin insisting that only judges have the ability to make that information public and Tapper arguing that there is additional information that Attorney General Pam Bondi could — and has promised to — release, yet she has not done so.

Then Mullin made a bizarre claim that Epstein struck a deal in Florida in 2009, under President Obama. But that is factually incorrect, as Tapper pointed out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 54 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

A few weeks ago I had to correct someone on Lemmy who was blaming Obama for the "great recession". The comment even had a bunch of up votes.

Other people proceeded to also argue with me that Obama, who was sworn in on Jan 20th 2009, was responsible for the Great recession that started December 2007.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Though Obama did team up with Bush to ensure the banks that caused it were bailed out quickly. This happened sometime around nov or dec 2008, after Obama had been elected but before he was sworn in.

And it was changes made during the Clinton presidency that allowed so many high risk mortgages to exist in the first place.

Not sure if the approval to bundle them together and call them lower risk was a Bush era thing or came from before that.

But even if the timing of the recession had started in 2009, it would have been something Obama inherited from Bush and Clinton. He only controlled his response to it (which wasn't great, as that money was used to allow banks to pay bonuses and buy up foreclosed properties while people laid off for no fault of their own lost their homes).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

I honestly don't believe a lot of the anti-DNC content is organic. Like, yeah, we DO have lemmy users who don't like the DNC, in no short supply. But more than that I think their representation and vote power is just botnets by Chinese and Russian trolls/psyops trying to create situations beneficial to their masters.

Generally, people in the USA are tribalistic between the two sides or simply uninformed. To think more than half of a niche but open platform like Lemmy would be against both sides is just improbable.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Lemmy has a much higher than average population of actual socialists, communists, and anarchists. It doesn't blow my mind that they would oppose a neoliberal party that works exclusively for the rich.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

There's opposing the neo liberals and then there's blatant fascist propaganda.

Like the fact that Obama used the double tap drone strike, which is unarguably a war crime because it almost always hits first responders.

That's a true and valid criticism.

Making believe that Obama had anything to do with Epstein or that he started Bush's recession is just shifting blame away from the fascist party and helps no one but the fascists.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There may be some bots, but honestly based on some conversations I've had with tankies and fake "leftist" many are some of the stupidest people I've talked to even compared to some brain dead Republicans.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Those bots have to play stupid, otherwise their propaganda isn't consistent enough and they will be found out easily.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not saying there are no bots, but some of them are definitely just that dumb.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I think you mean children. A whole lot of people commenting are literal children with no idea how the world works yet, or at the least very little.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Look at the little guy and his little hat. Precious.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

“All hat, no cattle”

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What a fucking embarrassment. Christ.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah… but that’s why they hate higher education. These morons have so much money, and they’re still stupid AF.

They're not trying to convince themselves.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Of course it's twofirstnames mullin. Dude is pure scum.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are we also ignoring that the AG that have Epstein the plea deal was Secretary of Labor under trump?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

Alex can acosta deez nuts in his mouth!

Something about a special tree and its own need for fertilization...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

This the idiot hick who wanted to fight the Teamsters guy in a committee meeting?

Yeah. Seems like a real genius.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Guys, he was the secret president before he was the real president!

-This jackass

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

This is what happens when you run as an R only. Oklahomans don't care about who or what is on the ballot. If it has a -R, then that's the ticket!

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Denying the truth and rewriting history is tmright out of 1984. All they lack is the enforcement part where if anyone disagrees with the rewrite, they would get black bagged.

Oh, didn't ICE just get more funding then most military

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

Gotta be like China to compete with China.
Soon there will be dates you cannot speak of. Children working in factories. One political party. (Problem is we don’t export anything.)

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

That hat sure makes him look extra brokeback.

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

His idiot redneck parents couldn’t decide on Mark or Wayne. The rotten apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Fkn hillbillies.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I've heard of having two first names. But two first names concatenated to make a first name? I'd say that's new except "Markwayne" wasn't exactly born yesterday.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Why would he admit it? The MAGA base loves the lies. Why tell the truth if that would cause MAGAs to get mad and possibly not vote for you?

load more comments
view more: next ›