this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
718 points (98.1% liked)

Political Weirdos

1068 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 days ago (4 children)

This is Kanye-level rage baiting

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thagoat@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 5 days ago
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I may have been a little kid in the '80s, but I don't remember Jr High being an acceptable part of the general dating pool. I also don't remember any major changes in the '90s to how acceptable relationships between adults and teenagers were.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Her grandma's time also had polio, that doesn't mean it would be okay for it to happen again now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Times have changed, that's for sure. There are still huge, successful rock acts that are known to have engaged in that. I'm not excusing any of it but it was normalized, and to a degree we overlook it with varying levels of cognitive dissonance. My 16 year old prom date in 1990 went with me as friends because her boyfriend was 29 with the full blessing of her parents. Child porn wasn't illegal until 5 years after I was born.

But also I look back on those times and see so many girls with what today would be clearly seen as signs of abuse (including my prom date). It was always wrong. It was always harmful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Social media has gotten people to think the most awful things without any hint of irony.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh no, my friend, she believed that fucked up shit long before social media. It's the classic language of someone who grew up in a horrible environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then why was it illegal even back then?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Child marriage was legal in all 50 states until 2018. Since then, 16 states have passed bans, and advocates continue to push lawmakers to end the practice.

10 states have a minimum marrying age of 17; 20 states have a minimum age of 16; two states have a minimum age of 15; and four states don’t have a minimum age specified at all.

So it's not really illegal. You just need to be married first.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure you could go back 1000 years and people would have a problem with a 12 year old being forced to give birth

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

So basically: "Yeah, he was raping 14 year olds, it's no big deal. Everyone was doing it."

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Wacky cunt.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Man she us all over the place with ages there.

14
12
15
15
15
10 (Too young)
13

How many times do you think they thought about what age they were comfortable going down to when the right answer was none of this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Girl, no, we practically share a date of birth, and I remember distinctly that 18 has always been the age of consent, including many places outside the US. I was shocked to find out some places had lower legal limits.

[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

The age of consent in your state may surprise you then. It is 16 for most of them. I grew up in Canada, and it was 14 until 2009, and is 16 now. As a father of teenagers, I've noted that age of consent is a double-edged sword, "protecting the children" not only from would-be sexual predators, but also from themselves when they choose to express their gender differently. Because what it really is, is an age of asserting bodily autonomy. Whether I like it or not, there comes an age when my teens should have a right to do whatever they want with their own bodies. In my opinion, it's fine to pick an age to be a legal guideline for when a person is incapable of asserting their own rights, but we should immediately defer to the choice of an individual whenever a person is old enough to demand it.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago

Throughout her career, Banks's social media presence and outspoken views, especially on U.S. politics and race, as well as disputes with other artists, have attracted significant controversy. Banks has been accused of homophobia, transphobia, and xenophobia towards multiple nationalities. Complex noted in 2014 that "she gets more attention for her public feuds than she does for her music".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azealia_Banks

it sounds like the controversy and negative attention is the point, and this post just further rewards the behavior

outrage is its own reward for some

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, as societies we don't tend to ban things that nobody does. Civilized societies have banned sex with underaged people because it's harmful for the kids and because people are driven to do it.

[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (12 children)

This is that lady who killed so many chickens in her hallway closet in the name of "witchcraft" that she had to use a sander to get the dried blood and offal out of the floorboards.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Future generations treating past generations with disdain is kind of the whole point of social progress. Slavery has only been a social taboo in the last couple centuries max. Women's equal political rights are even more recent, only about 100 years. LGBT rights are barely a generation old. So wtf is this argument? It's logical extension is "infant exposure is OK, the Romans did it just fine"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›