this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
509 points (83.1% liked)

Comic Strips

18495 readers
1758 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 57 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fuck no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_test

Between the 1850s and 1960s, literacy tests were used as an effective tool for disenfranchising African Americans in the Southern United States. Literacy tests were typically administered by white clerks who could pass or fail a person at their discretion based on race. Illiterate whites were often permitted to vote without taking these literacy tests because of grandfather clauses written into legislation.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The problem there is the administration of the tests, not the tests themselves.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (8 children)

And that is a non-solvable problem.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (9 children)

you think the current racist rich people wouldn't be racist and rich if we introduced an exam to the voting process?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eluvatar@programming.dev 52 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Who determines the questions and answers? Now they are the ones determining who can vote and thus the people in control.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Brazil had something like that in the early republic days, only literate people could vote. Needless to say, only the robber baron elites kept getting elected, also thanks to the significant amount of fraud that happened. "The election is won during the counting"

[–] Blujayooo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Good point, maybe the idea works better in theory than practice. Haha

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

They used to do that in the US during the Jim Crow era. It went predictably.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it sounds fun unless you have any awareness of how this actually worked out when it was used in the past. Fully not okay.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

You mean tests that were designed to ensure that only "the right people" were able to pass them. As well as a grandfather clause that exempted all of those right people (in modern times there would likely be a voter roll purge that would somehow lose most liberal voters while miraculously keeping all of the conservative ones).

[–] bremen15@feddit.org 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It's not working. We have relatively equal education in Germany, and we have plenty of intelligent, educated people voting far right.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“Educated” does not equal intelligent, and it certainly does not imply broad intelligence. You can train a relatively stupid human being to do all kinds of stuff and if you’ve ever worked with people with degrees you know what little value they carry.

I went to college and have white collar career and my family is largely university educated. I worked with structural engineers at my last job and half them were just barely able to do their jobs with the worst ones being the senior people. Elsewhere in the world there have been anti-vax doctors and nurses, psychotic therapists, and theologians who have read the bible who still do all the horrible things they definitely know are bullshit. I bet nearly half the people here on Lemmy know a software developer or three who shouldn’t ever touch a computer. People with degrees are more likely to be more intelligent but, especially while living in a world where they’re basically expected, that’s really just not a guarantee.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Even people who are actually smart buy into fascism, though. It's not just a question of dumb vs intelligent, but of ethics.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even if you assumed the test successfully filtered out an educated voterbase, it would take all but five seconds for X party to cheat their exams, kind of like the "grandfather law" which essentially bypassed jim crow era literacy tests for everyone who was white.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Even if you assumed the test successfully filtered out an educated voterbase

"Educated" is already doing some heavy lifting. What education are you demanding voters possess?

Because I've had an earful about "Marxist Professors corrupting our youth!" for my entire life. I doubt conservatives would consider any kind of liberal exam a legitimate test of voting aptitude.

Meanwhile, there's enough jingoism and nationalism in our education system already, such that I could see an exam question "Which religious extremist sect was responsible for 9/11? Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists" or "Is an individual with XY chromosomes a man or a woman?" that's a bit... loaded? Especially when administered right before a national election.

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago

InB4 the Non-Voters just start doing the Wilmington Massacre repeatedly.

Check your history books about what happens when the majority of the population has no political voice. Things get ugly.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Still trying to figure out what happened in the second frame.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Except the candidates would all be garbage anyways haha

[–] anon@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

Candidates being all garbage is exactly what you'd expect when they're just pawns for the people actually running the government (i.e. owners of big corporations).

Since they're shit, they're not popular and can't achieve much on their own. When they're not useful anymore they can be blamed and replaced by the next puppet.

Of course they're also shit, exactly because they're in the pocket of the very wealthy. In the US it seems even impossible to gain any significant position without their blessing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireAtWill@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

It's not all lazy and slow-witted voters, the media presents the news as if we all had a degree in government. That's apparently what they've put in as a filter but it only allows the worst of the bunch to fly by the seat of their pants, getting their vote from impressions and gut feelings.

load more comments
view more: next ›