this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

World News

48958 readers
1715 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The head of the Federal Aviation Administration said on Thursday the fatal crash last month of an Air India Boeing BA.N 787 jet does not appear to have been caused by a mechanical issue or inadvertent movement of the fuel control unit or switches.

Reuters reported last week, citing a source, that the cockpit recording on the Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick suggested the captain cut fuel to the engines.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've read that the flight-deck voice-recorder captured something like "why did you shut-off the fuel-lines?"..

Those powerplants need fuel measured in litres-PER-SECOND, not per minute, the way piston-engines do.

( There's a channel on yt by a guy AgenJayZ, he has a turbojet-repair shop in the Praries, in Canada..

he showed, in 1 of his videos, how he tests a single fuel-nozzle, for 1 ( of 5 ) combustor-cans in a jet he was working-on..

28-imperial-gallons/minute, that nozzle sprayed-out..

Times 5, & you've got 140-imperial-gallons/minute pouring into that SINGLE jet-engine..

that's around 635-litres/min, aka 10.5-litres-per-second for that engine..

You CAN'T survive killing the fuel-lines on an airliner, while just after takeoff:

Flamout, & you can't restart before crashing.

Here's a yt-search, & the video I say may be in that list, but it's been a few years..

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jayz+jet+engine+fuel-nozzle+test )


To me the only question left isn't "how", but why:

Did the person on the flight-deck who killed the airliner do it of their unconscious-mind's belligerance, XOR did they do it consciously-intentionally?

( the video, I hope you've seen it, of the gorilla-suit guy walking through some people tossing a ball around, & half the people in the game didn't notice the gorilla-suit guy..

Normal people can't imagine just how much of our lives our unconscious-mind blocks from our awareness, & be "well adjusted"..

I'm not accusing that person's conscious mind of doing it, but their unconscious-mind's intent definitely was involved, either-way. )

_ /\ _

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Great, now look at electrical issues.

Blaming the pilot benefits the airline, to avoid claims of poor maintenance, and the airplane maker, to avoid claims of a shitty aircraft.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It was almost guaranteed to be a suicide by one of the pilots. All of the evidence points that way.

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 15 points 1 week ago

If it was an electrical issue, they wouldn't have been able to just turn them back on, which one of the pilots did.

The two switches were moved to off sequentially with the right amount of gap for a human doing it quickly. One of the pilots then questioned why they were off, and they were then both turned back on individually a short time later.

The possibility the FAA was investigating was whether the latches on the switches may not work, allowing them to be moved unintentionally. This was unlikely due to the timing, but they still had to eliminate it.