Hi @BevelGear - Could you clarify a bit what kind of discussion you're after by posting this? Also, most folks on Beehaw are probably not lawyers so posting a supreme court ruling without any commentary or clarification probably isn't the most conducive to good discussion.
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
5 points (85.7% liked)
Politics
10700 readers
282 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It was an interesting document to skim through and wanted to share it for the curious. That is all.
I understand you would like discussion and I apologize for disappointing you.
This is, at best, 17 months old. (That October 2023 overline makes things unclear.)
It's fine to point out older sources; dumping them without context isn't particularly useful. As a community, we're here to have conversations, which this post does not engender. It's not a matter of the topic, just that it's old and has no bearing on current events.
Duly noted. I won't so it again.
Sorry if it seems like you're being scolded - that's not my intention. I think it's fine to post something like this, but maybe I'm the future a brief explanation of why you found it worth posting would be helpful to get the discussion started - either in the post body or a comment.