this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
387 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
3633 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 203 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The word "blame" normally implies that something bad has happened.

[–] tedd_deireadh@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly!

"So, sorry we'd love to help you astroturf the EU elections, but those pesky laws are stopping us."

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Exactly this. This messaging is for their customers, e.g. those that buy political ads, and their investors, those that want line go up regardless of how. They aren't speaking to their users. Their users are part of the product they sell.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

Bots and troll farms are not impacted, though. I don't expect this will lead to better politics.

[–] genau@europe.pub 100 points 1 week ago

This is good.

[–] comrade_frosty@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wish we could have some of those rules here in the US...

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Wish we could have some of those rules here in the UK...

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 week ago

Blaming?

You mean citing.

This is a good thing.

meta: we're stopping political ads because of the evil eu pls write them and complain

literally everyone: another benefit to being in the eu <3

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 33 points 1 week ago

They should also fuck off

[–] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is Meta threatening us in the EU with a good time?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

EU is threatening Meta with a bad time

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

this is a good thing though??

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Thanks to bloc's new rules I guess. Fuck meta.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

We're sad to announce that, from that day forward, you will no longer be able to see political ads on Meta services like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

(Idk how to blame the EU while trying to sound like a sane, professional corporation not throwing a hissy fit)

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A fantastic example of why regulation can be good and is often necessary. You can‘t leave tech corporations or even most corporations on their own accord. They need a short leash or they‘re going to tear humanity apart.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

Under the regulations, which are set to take effect on Oct. 10, platforms will have to label political ads, disclosing who paid for them, and what campaign, referendum or legislative process they’re connected to

Oh yeah they sound really unworkable, who could possibly expect meta to take this very basic information from their advertisers and then display it in a small text box.

Of course not seeing the ads is even better so I don't think anyone will complain.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

nothing is stopping them to push propaganda(russian backed) into peoples feeds that arnt ads.

[–] mia@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren't these ads too? Someone as paid for this propaganda so it is technically ads right?

Like reedit they look the other way because fake accounts generate lots of engagement. They could easily shut down such accounts and they choose not to.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

While pushing right wing and Russian „news“ I assume.

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Damn stupid me! Once again thought this was #goodnews

[–] VisionScout@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 week ago

I guess this is a win-win situation 🤩

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

"I'm sorry to say I cannot accept any more money from ~~disinformation groups~~ political parties, particularly from certain regions* because another region won't let me put your ads out there for the ~~plebs~~ users to be ~~manipulated~~ informed."

^*^ ^-^ ^Russia,^ ^China,^ ^North^ ^Korea,^ ^Iran,^ ^and^ ^other^ ^associated^ ^places.^

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

I see this as an absolute win

[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Fantastic news. Get the fuck out, Zuck

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good, now Hungary can put that 2M EUR per month from propaganda into research, education and healthcare.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah it has already been allocated to Orban's private residence.

[–] 100@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

10m to build another stadium in his hometown

[–] brot@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's be honest: We are talking about several billions of dollars of ad revenue over the years. Meta has the resources to work within those rules and earn billions. If they do not want to do that, there is something really shady going on.

[–] coolmultitool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Or maybe long term plan: let the political parties know if they want back in, to revise their policies in a more pro-meta stance?

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The regulations impose additional requirements for a reason - because political advertising can be extremely dangerous. If it's a question of no political advertising or opaque, microtargeted political advertising that can't be investigated later, then it's an easy choice.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There is nothing to blame about except this should have come earlier and everywhere.