If your walking/riding on the road your a second class.. nay disregarded in all aspects of reality for only the benefit of motorized. You might as well have signs that says if your not in a car and using this path.. you will forgo your basic rights.
Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
an unknown vehicle hit his motorcycle moments later and left the scene.
No arrests have been made.
Hit-and-run probably works more than 50% of the time, so people do it.
But to be honest, the driver wouldn't get much punishment anyway. Maybe a ticket.
Lives outside of cars don't seem to matter.
It says that an unknown vehicle hit the bike after he had already fallen and left the scene.
Imagine someone loses control of a motorcycle and falls off in front of your car and you hit him.
Even if someone is attentive and slams the breaks, there’s no guarantee that you will not hit the person.
Then you get charged with manslaughter or something. Is it just me or does it seem unfair for a situation like that?
The article only says the bike was hit after the man had fallen off the bike and the car left the scene, but I kind of don’t blame them for leaving.
What you smoking? No one in New York is ever charged with vehicular manslaughter. It's all an "accident".You can even flee the scene like happened here, and if you are found you will still not be charged (leaving the scene of an accident involving injury or death is a crime but never enforced for some reason, a small traffic fine at worst). Just look, if they ever find this driver, all they'll do is ask some questions and let them go. You can even drive drunk, kill someone with the car, flee the scene, evade capture for days, and then maybe you'll be charged, but the charges will be dismissed anyway because now days later you being drunk cannot be definitely proven.
Imagine not leaving enough room to respond. You do this to another car (rear end) and you are automatically at fault. What's different in this scenario?