this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
81 points (93.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
653 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy12369@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If your walking/riding on the road your a second class.. nay disregarded in all aspects of reality for only the benefit of motorized. You might as well have signs that says if your not in a car and using this path.. you will forgo your basic rights.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

an unknown vehicle hit his motorcycle moments later and left the scene.

No arrests have been made.

Hit-and-run probably works more than 50% of the time, so people do it.

But to be honest, the driver wouldn't get much punishment anyway. Maybe a ticket.

Lives outside of cars don't seem to matter.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It says that an unknown vehicle hit the bike after he had already fallen and left the scene.

Imagine someone loses control of a motorcycle and falls off in front of your car and you hit him.

Even if someone is attentive and slams the breaks, there’s no guarantee that you will not hit the person.

Then you get charged with manslaughter or something. Is it just me or does it seem unfair for a situation like that?

The article only says the bike was hit after the man had fallen off the bike and the car left the scene, but I kind of don’t blame them for leaving.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

What you smoking? No one in New York is ever charged with vehicular manslaughter. It's all an "accident".You can even flee the scene like happened here, and if you are found you will still not be charged (leaving the scene of an accident involving injury or death is a crime but never enforced for some reason, a small traffic fine at worst). Just look, if they ever find this driver, all they'll do is ask some questions and let them go. You can even drive drunk, kill someone with the car, flee the scene, evade capture for days, and then maybe you'll be charged, but the charges will be dismissed anyway because now days later you being drunk cannot be definitely proven.

[–] wraithcoop@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Imagine not leaving enough room to respond. You do this to another car (rear end) and you are automatically at fault. What's different in this scenario?