this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
234 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25045 readers
1801 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House is eyeing redistricting efforts beyond Texas to help Republicans hold the U.S. House in 2026 — and Democrats are preparing to escalate in response, with one senator vowing to go “nuclear” if needed.

What’s shaping up to be a multistate redistricting battle could mark the opening round for House control ahead of next year’s midterms, when Democrats see retaking the House as the party’s best chance to break Republicans’ hold on Congress and President Donald Trump is determined to keep the GOP’s majority. Democrats, under pressure from their base to match GOP tactics, have grown more forceful in their messaging and are taking concrete steps to push back, even as the party enters at a disadvantage.

“If they’re going to go nuclear, then so am I,” said Sen. Elissa Slotkin. “They’re forcing us into this position because they’re trying to pick their voters.”

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

it still blows my mind that the majority party being able to redraw district lines to stay in power is somehow legal.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blame the SCOTUS. At least some states like Pennsylvania had their courts rule gerrymandering as unconstitutional (for their state, not federally). Unfortunately, a lot of other states still gladly allow it.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

Our supreme court in ohio ruled the state drawn districts were illegal 3 times in 2021-2022, but nothing was done about it and the illegal maps were used in the elections.

Also it's completely unrelated that the governor's son is a supreme court justice.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

It still blows my mind that Americans are still pointing at shit saying “that’s illegal” when the law hasn’t mattered for like a decade.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

"Legal" is just a label the people in power put on the things they want to do. We don't have a functioning justice system, and I'm not certain we ever did.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats are where they are because they like following rules. Republicans have an objective and want to see it finished. Following rules and decorum for 60 years has gotten Democrats nowhere. Democrats have to play by Republican standards otherwise the results will keep getting worse.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Democrats are where they are because they like following rules.

Nnnnnoooo, they follow the rules because they're the rules. If it's just total anarchy you want, any political party won't scratch that itch.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about calling for and organizing a nation wide general strike????

Oh right, that would hurt their billionaire donors and actually accomplish things for the working class.

They act like they have no power but hand wringing. But that's because that's all they choose to do.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The ruling class has spent the last century or so systematically dismantling the American left. Unfortunately the Democrats are a right wing party and have no interest in this kind of disruption - they're just as owned by billionaires as the Republicans are, it's just a more polite faction of capitalists.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Take the population, plug it into a video game map generator, tell it to make all population of sections equal, generate 30 variations, and put them to a vote.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Why divide it into districts and not just let every vote count?

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wild how these are the same people who always scream that the election was rigged every time a dem wins.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Projection. It's always projection.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, to be fair, the Dems only say they're gonna 'go nuclear' when they have no hope of winning. They had 4 years to box an orange turd and right the ship. Guess that was too much.

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

The Democrats are sharpening their pencils and are going to write the sternest letter anyone has ever seen

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt Dems are doing crap. We’re sleepwalking into fascism.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's no sleeping. You're straight up walking into fascism with your eyes wide open.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What would the "nuclear" option be for the democrats? (genuine question?

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Redraw California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Washington, and Oregon districts to overwhelm the handful of Republican districts there.

Then

Take full advantage of the fact that the R's are pushing a very unpopular agenda and will have to weaken their advantages in red districts (making them a bit swingier) in order to get rid of blue districts.

I would love to see Illinois redraw their maps so that every district includes a part of Chicago.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

A VERY VERY UNBELIEVABLY STERN SIGNED LETTER!

[–] ThatsTheSpirit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It would be revealing themselves as the new bolshevik party then handing guns ammo and body armor out to registered dems along with a copy of state&revolution...maybe some marching orders even i dunno. You asked for nuclear (;

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The short answer is gerrymandering California, but you don't stop corruption with equal and opposite corruption. I'm afraid we don't have an opposition party willing to do what is necessary to actually fight corruption.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but you don't stop corruption with equal and opposite corruption.

This is why we will always be at a disadvantage.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That depends on how you play the game. Stopping corruption begins with calling it out and demanding it end. You can't cower in the corner because you "lack the votes" or because public opinion isn't behind you. Doing what is right means you will lose a lot of battles, but you're always fighting.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

It'll never be a fair fight when only one side is morally and ethically fine with rampant corruption.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Lmao democrats ain't doing shi-