this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
147 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17464 readers
1122 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not a single person would ever walk on that thing. It looks at least twice as long as the direct path.

Alternative solution, block off the road to get ready for construction. Then realize it's nice not having that road there, and get rid of it. Money saved and it's nicer.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It was supposed to have info panels on it and the reason it’s so goofy is because that area is designated at a National Landmark so it was designed to comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for preservation.

I don’t mind the sentiment of linking the state with the city but yes, that bridge is a waste of money and only detracts from the space.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The bridge was the governor’s idea to celebrate the state’s 150th anniversary. But it was panned by lawmakers, historic preservationists and, apparently, the public.

The bridge would have been paid for by private donations, though the state shelled out $1.5 million in planning costs.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Who the fuck is privately donating $28.5 million to the state to build a walkway in front of tne capitol? I don't really have an opinion on the bridge itself but I really want to know who's throwing money at this.

[–] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I am failing to comprehend what is going on here. He wants to stop a bridge, that was his idea? Am I reading that right?

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Yes, because no one else wants it, including: lawmakers, preservationists, and the public. It was a design by committee project that the public had no real say in what it would be or look like. No one liked it when it was finally unveiled.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

The article that is linked in the post explains it pretty well.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Just build tiny houses, Polis! That boondogle would have just been inadequate shelter for the homeless anyway.

Build affordable housing!

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

He has courage I give him that