this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
722 points (98.8% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

7723 readers
238 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also funny how psychological projection was formalized as a concept by Freud. Have anything to tell us, Sigmund?

[–] radix@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mathematicians: get novel ideas named after themselves.
Freud: No, no, it was totally that other guy.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

He did get Freudian Slip named after him though.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Everyone should reread the story. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Oedipus-Greek-mythology

Dude didn't know and was trying to be a great guy.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This source says he blinded himself, but did not kill himself. His mother killed herself though

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah he shows up later in Antimoney to basically goof it up and be like "oh yeah nah this whole family is fucked because of some fucked shit. anyway, i'm here to be both wise and a goofass"

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming autocorrect got you, but for anyone that is trying to look up more info: the play name is Antigone.

[–] coaxil@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Freud was trying to be the best cokehead

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I gonna be honest, its much more advisable to read some form of summary, because the original text is boring as hell, written in a very hard to understand style and is all in all a complete shithole.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 week ago

We read this in school in like the 7th grade. When the teacher read out something to the tune of "I've soiled the field from which I had sprung" I gave a little laugh and the teacher stopped and asked the class if anyone else knew what that meant. Not a single other kid had a clue, or at least didn't want to answer.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Post-Nut Clarity strikes again

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh man it just sucks when you "accidentally" have sex with your mom.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also known as a Freudian slip.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

she said to say hi to her kid so im saying hi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not my fault I broke my arms

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

oh no, that story 😭

(context for others)

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is like Orwell who devoted his life as a (anarchist leaning) democratic socialist to fight authoritarianism.

And now authoritarian things are called “Orwellian”.

[–] lazyViking@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it makes some sense tho, isn't it Orwellian because it matches the horrific dystopian shit he predicted in his books?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of it was experience. The overarching theme of 1984 was the inevitable betrayal, which was a concept he grappled with most of his life.

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well I think most of his life is a bit much. I think specifically it’s his experience when he fought in Catalonia for the anti-authoritarian Marxists (POUM) having the Stalin backed communists betray POUM and kill and imprison his comrades.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It definitely fuelled a few decades of his writing.

[–] lazyViking@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I wish I was smart enough to understand what you guys are ~~arguing about~~ discussing

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (8 children)

How do these things seem to get turned around? Oedipus, jack of all trades, blood is thicker than water, curiosity killed the cat… so many phrases get truncated and used to mean the opposite of what they originally intended.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Pulling oneself by one's bootstraps used to signify the absurdity of getting out of a difficult situation all on your own.

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Per this comment I found it seems that "Blood is thicker than water" didn't change its meaning.

https://www.reddit.com/r/linguistics/comments/37a4lg/comment/crl1yly/

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Adding to this to say "Jack of all trades" also hasn't changed its meaning. The "But master of none" seems to be a latter addition, and doesn't really negate the original meaning of "being capable in a lot of trades". Additionally, there is some belief that there is a following third part "but oftentimes better than a master of one" rehighlighting the value of being skilled in multiple "trades".

Source - Wiki Jack of all trades

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can see it easily, except for Oedipus. They're all about subverting the initial phrase but when people know the whole thing, they just shorten it to the start of the phrase.

New people come in, hearing only the start of the phrase and assume incorrectly what it's referring to before passing that along.

This makes sense. Common usage shortened it because everyone knows it, but then it begins to be misunderstood and then misused because the shortened version makes more sense.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How do these things seem to get turned around?

Time basically.

Some of it is because of Irony. Similar to how people in the 80/90s use the word "Bad" to mean "Really Good", other words changed meaning because of ironic usage.

Egregious used to mean "rising above the flock, exceptional, distinguished." People kept using it ironically so much that it now means exceptionally bad or distinguished by being particularly bad.

Other words have had a more gradual evolution to their opposites, like "Nice". It originally meant foolish or weak. During the middle ages it came to mean shy, reserved, or fastidious, but those qualities were still considered 'weak'. In the late 1700s society began to see merit in those qualities and so being 'nice' was no longer a foolish or bad thing to be.

Same thing with phrases and idioms. Hundreds of years can have a weird effect on language.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

curiosity killed the cat but satisfaction brought it back

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

all of those are (close to) the original phrase, they did not get truncated, they got amended later. Now why someone would try to turn their meanings around that way is still a good question

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly I don't see why it'd matter what the "original" phrase is (except for Oedipus but that's an entire story). Just because it's the original doesn't make it more true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

On the other hand, any mythological stories about sons who schutpped Mom and had no regrets? Pretty sure that's not a thing.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

I always said that my ignorance of Greek mythology was my Sword of Achilles

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well there's the biblical story of Lot and his two daughters getting him drunk so they can get pregnant with his seed:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+19%3A30-38&version=NIV

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

We're talking about mythology here.

Everyone knows the Bible is all literally true.

[jk]

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

eats fortune cookie

"You will have sex with your mother"

...

👀

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of Diogenes syndrome.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Fuck everyone's mother including his own?

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

"Freud's ideas of castration anxiety and penis envy refer to the differences of the sexes in their experience of the Oedipus complex."

https://wiki.froth.zone/wiki/Oedipus_complex

BrandOldSentence?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sign my Change.org petition to rename climate change to The Al Gore Effect.

load more comments
view more: next ›