Dammit, I am confused.
In this article from BBC, it says:
The ruling is non-binding
In another article from the Guardian, it says the opposite:
Countries are now bound under international law
Which one is it?
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Dammit, I am confused.
In this article from BBC, it says:
The ruling is non-binding
In another article from the Guardian, it says the opposite:
Countries are now bound under international law
Which one is it?
I think it's non-binding, after all.