this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

Good News Everyone

1120 readers
107 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics & schadenfreude

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world’s top greenhouse gas emitters denied they had any obligations beyond the UN framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) and the 2015 Paris agreement. The court resoundingly rejected that argument, saying a range of other treaties applied, including the UN convention on the law of the sea, the Vienna convention for the protection of the ozone layer, the Montreal protocol, the convention on biological diversity and the UN convention to combat desertification.

Customary international law also applied, it said, including principles of sustainable development, common but differentiated responsibilities, equity, intergenerational equity and the precautionary principle. States also had a duty to work together to protect the climate, the court said

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, good ol' unenforceable intentions. What Copium© is made of, citizens! Get yours today! 🤌🏼

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The more people speak up in favor of it, the more likely it becomes.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

That is a logical fallacy. Didn't you ever watch How A Bill Gets Made?

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Abolish UN veto rights!

I wonder how many plastic I have to recycle to undo China, India polution 🤔