this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

World News

476 readers
571 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has pledged to submit a draft law to the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) that will "empower the law enforcement system" and preserve "all provisions necessary for the independence of anti-corruption institutions".

Source: Zelenskyy in his evening address on 23 July

Quote: "Of course, everyone has heard what people have been saying these days – on social media, to one another, in the streets. None of this is in vain. We have analysed all the concerns, all the aspects of what needs to be changed and what must be stepped up.

I will propose to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine a draft law that will be a response, one that will empower the law enforcement system. And there will be no Russian influence or interference in the activities of law enforcement bodies, and – very importantly – all provisions for the independence of anti-corruption institutions will remain. And I strongly expect from our group of law enforcement and anti-corruption leaders, from the Prosecutor General of Ukraine, proposals for the provisions that must be implemented. This will be a presidential draft law and we will carry it out as part of our strategy for transforming the state."

Details: Zelenskyy said that during a recent meeting with the heads of law enforcement and anti-corruption bodies, it was agreed that the heads of the institutions would jointly propose a plan of action and concrete steps to "strengthen the rule of law in Ukraine".

Background:

On 21 July, employees of the Security Service of Ukraine and the Prosecutor General's Office conducted approximately 80 searches targeting 19 employees of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau in various oblasts of Ukraine.On 22 July, the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) voted for draft law No. 12414 that would make the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) – currently independent anti-corruption institutions – dependent on the decisions of the prosecutor general.On the evening of 22 July, Zelenskyy signed bill No. 12414.Protests were held in many cities across Ukraine following the adoption of this legislative initiative.

Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Still wondering what the stated need is for attempting to move these bodies under the executive umbrella

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, the whole thing is weird to me. Obvious possibilities are:

  • The bill was a good idea, and Russian disinfo has gotten skilled enough at manipulating Ukraine's public opinion that people are out in the streets angry about it
  • The anti-corruption forces were so riddled with Russian corruption that it actually was a good idea to just kneecap them, but people are justifiably furious about eliminating their independence, because "trust me just let me run everything I'll fix it" doesn't make for a sustainable future even if it's true at the moment (see also Hugo Chavez)
  • The anti-corruption forces were doing anti-corruption, but Zelensky was horrible and corrupt this whole time, and now he's showing his true colors and people are outraged and rightly so

My guess is that it's #2, but I really don't know enough about the situation for it to be immediately understandable to me. It's confusing.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tatarov and Yermak among other members of the office of the president are attempting to set up the new oligarchy.

Not sure if Zelensky is part of it or he needs these jokers to run the state but it is definitely happening.

They are being investigated for their corrupt dealings for years and have been trying to gut anti corruption momentum since before the war.

While it is true that anti corruption office office has been infiltrated by Russian spies, it seems like the government used it as opportunity to put them directly under executive which will make it it impotent.

I don't see why it has to go under executive. Office is subject to the national security laws so Ukrainian spooks got all the power to deal with spies. The prosecutorial decisions need to be made free from pressure of the executive considering that all big ticket corruption essentially has to go through the executive. That'd why office was made independent to be begin with.

Zelensky playing stupid here and he better [get] his act together. Corruption is the second best biggest issue after the war.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I had a feeling that this story would attract some of this

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

please to expand on "this"

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People trying to spin it up into a reason to throw in twisty little words and phrases or otherwise in some way attack Zelenksy and Ukraine

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What specifically was the "attack" here?

If you got better facts, please do share with the class.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You removed some of the twisty phrasings, I think... things like the Zelenksy "better his act together" are what I was mainly calling out. Anyway, your past participation makes me basically assume the opposite of what you say is probably true (in this case that those two people you mentioned are probably part of the good guys).

I have no idea about any of this factually, I'm just waiting for more information and in the meantime calling balls and strikes as I see them.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

i appreciate you keep it real, also you can look into this yourself. they both have wikipedia pages and plenty of articles surrounding their corrupt dealings.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The wording is baity, but the sentiment is real. Neutering your anti-corruption agencies is a huge blunder. There's going to be protests and it's going to feed the Russian propaganda machine hard.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, agreed. The obvious first-glance reading is that it's a bad mistake or else open corruption. I don't think it's likely to be either of those, but maybe so, and hence my confusion.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

promises

Pffft.