this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
869 points (98.1% liked)

tumblr

4880 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I honestly can't help but laugh at these trucks...

Especially when you see the 5'6 45 year old struggling to climb back in at a gas station after leaving his AC office drone job.

They really think their big truck makes them a big man.

All it does is scream to everyone else that you're insecure in your own masculinity and spent ~80k and a shit ton of gas money to try and compensate.

[–] scops@reddthat.com 37 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What gets me is that they are always fucking spotless. My '09 Ranger is all dirty, scratched up, with various straps and ropes in the bed.

God forbid they use their truck like a truck.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

my fucking e-bike is less pristine than these things

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

BRO! I worked for a paving company years back and the business manager had this raised modified to all hell f350 (trash). He'd get it washed every week, rarely used it for actual work other than dragging a trailer and it CONSTANTLY broke down. Damn thing was impossible to load anything but buckets cuz the bed was as high as my friggin nipples (lol).

Bonus Question: Guess how tall he was

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I recently lost my '05 f150 that I used for work to frame rot, so I got a '17. I've put two holes in the bed, through the bed liner, and I haven't even been treating it that bad. It's almost as though Ford doesn't want you to use it for work harder than carrying your yeti between kids baseball games.

[–] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At some point they changed the bed from being made out of steel to aluminum, and you can really tell.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that was in 2014, yeah. I get it honestly, they're much lighter and they won't rust. But the bed should always be steel in my opinion.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I think the problem is they try to make it the same thickness as the sheet metal from the steel bed. If they made it 1/4" thick like the aluminum side step plates on a Bobcat it wouldn't be a problem and it'd still probably be lighter.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

My dad would always use the profits from growing tobacco on a new truck every other year...

One year he bought a new truck while we were actively putting the crop in a barn.

Truck was less than 48 hrs old and he was trying to pull a fully loaded wagon across a creek to get to a barn.

With brand new wet tires, he couldn't get out of the creek. So at like 11 years old I got to watch him put a brand new truck sideways into a tree because he was too proud to unhook and let someone else pull the wagon thru the creek. But he still got it in the barn.

He wasn't even that pissed, because the only reason to buy a truck, was to use it for actual truck shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Honestly it's pretty embarrassing for 6'1 55 year old too.

Western masculinity can be so fragile that some think consumerism is the only out of it.

Basically if you're using a pickup as a commuter vehicle..you probably don't make good life choices.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Basically if you're using a pickup as a commuter vehicle.

I use my truck as a truck, but it’s the only vehicle I own; with the prices of cars AND insurance AND put food on the table… forgettaboutit 🤌

.you probably don't make good life choices.

Hey! That’s beside the point! 😮‍💨 😔

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Oh for sure.

I played sports in college way back in the day, and still stay up with a lot of my old teammates. Most of us are huge, but I still give shit to every one of them that have giant trucks.

But it's still funnier when the driver of a giant truck struggles to get in/out of it and can barely see over their own steering wheel. At a certain height interior space does become a factor, but as long as you "gangster lean" you can still fit in a normal vehicle.

But I grew up on an actual farm, I've been making fun of oversized trucks since my cousin jacked his truck up so high it couldn't pull a wagon anymore. And that was back when the small truck in OPs post was sold new.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Basically if you're using a pickup as a commuter vehicle..you probably don't make good life choices.

That is false for nearly everyone. Unless you are driving double the miles of an average person, the costs of a second car that is practical for 99% of your needs and a truck for that last 1% is higher than the costs of just driving the truck for everything. You have to make payments and taxes on the truck even when it sits in the driveway. You might get a small insurance discount for a truck you rarely drive, but your insurance on two vehicles is higher than just one.

People say "just rent a truck", but every time I look into that I discover rental trucks come with a lot of restrictions such that you can't use them as a truck (I expect a truck used as a truck to get paint scratches). And the cost is so high that it won't take many rentals to making having a truck the cheaper option (getting right of the car in exchange).

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you use your truck as a truck often that's fair. My ire is more directed at those that fall into the categories below (and I know several people that do, some of whom are upper middle class and seven figure salary folk who just want the appearance of ruggedness).

According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-size-pickup-truck-you-need-a-cowboy-costume

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I lived in the same apartment complex as a guy who had one of these giant trucks. He was a short guy, had a sales job which provided him a company car but still decided that he would spend more on his car loan than he did on rent just to have this to ride in on the weekends. He was scrimping pennies on everything else just to afford that terrible decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The smaller one has a bigger bed 🤦

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My biggest gripe with modern trucks really. Have fun putting that new refrigerator you needed in there and then getting it out once you're home, and God forbid you put a toolbox behind the cab, you're climbing into that bed to get every little thing you didn't think you'd need because you can't just get it by reaching over the side.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

That's fake. There's way too much bed space.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Peak Chevy truck grill

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the one on the right

is also the one on the left... 😂

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

the text is actually from a pre-existing post

[–] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

God I miss small trucks. So much. So so much.

[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Right? All it needs to do is carry a stack of 4x8 plywood and a bunch of 2x4s, or the entire contents of a two-room apartment -- something a 1980's "mini" pickup like the Ford Ranger or Chevy S10 could easily handle.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The bed is a little narrow for 4x8' sheets of material on a 90s Ranger. There's only about 41" between the wheel arches and the opening in the bed itself above the arches is about 44" which is not quite enough. (It's wider in the gap above the arches but before the top lip of the bed, but you'll never get anything into that space that can't be disassembled or moved with a shovel...) You could stand your material up on edge, but don't try that with drywall. 48x40" pallets are no problem, though. Or at least one of them at a time. It'll slide right in there provided if and only if you orient it with the skinny dimension between the arches. Ditto with 2x4s if you want to leave the tailgate up. Otherwise your strap game had better be strong because the standard model has a 6' bed and the longer 7' bed is both rare and also not quite long enough. I used to drive a 90s Ranger for work and believe me, I crammed, or tried to cram, every type of thing you can think of into the back of it at some point or another. You can get a lot done with one but sheet goods are their downfall.

The 8' bed work trucks of the era could do what you're describing perfectly, and do so better than today's "full size" trucks while maintaining a smaller footprint on the pavement. That, and you can actually see out of the goddamned windows. I have a 90s Silverado in fleet truck spec, crank windows and a single cab with an 8' bed. I can indeed stack 4x8' drywall or ply neatly between the wheel arches and even close the tailgate on it. Much to the envy of my coworkers, who still pathologically own dinkum 6' bed crew cab so-called trucks that they can't fit anything into the back of, and then destroy the back seats "ThAt tHeY ToTaLlY NeEd bEcAuSe oF ReAsOnS" by jamming them full of tools and dirty materials anyway, so the whole thing is pointless. At that rate you may as well just get a van and call it a day.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 35 points 1 week ago

Pictured: a pickup truck in front of a cope wagon.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Every time I see a complaint about truck sizes, I make it a point to share this video explaining how it's actually the EPA's fault trucks have gotten so big.

https://youtu.be/azI3nqrHEXM

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

how it’s actually the EPA’s fault trucks have gotten so big.

🤨

No, the corporation's horrible behaviour is the fault of the regulators & regulations.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Plus those corporations are the ones lobbying for those regulations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It may not be only the EPA's fault, but an unintended consequences of the CAFE standards and how they change over time is a perverse incentive to increase wheelbase and track, lowering the fuel efficiency instead of raising it.

If you haven't yet, watch the video. It does a good job explaining why you can't make the Chevy S10 we used to see all over the place in the 90s without a big penalty that would make it too expensive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trucks, cars, all of it. I praise Mazda for keeping the Miata/MX-5 small when almost nobody else has.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (9 children)

if only they didn't give it headlights that blind people

nearly drove into one last night because it was coming up a small hill in front of me in my neighbourhood (on a curve) and I drifted left as I slowed down to ensure I didn't hit the pedestrians to my right. couldn't see a fucking thing because of its 'lowbeams'

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I feel this with so many new cars. Particularly when driving my car instead of my wife's which is pretty short.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Same bed size, probably same payload capacity, and you can actually grab something out of the bed on the old truck without needing a stepladder. Really the only thing that the new truck does better is towing, simply due to added engine power and bigger breaks.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That new truck is a F250 which can handle a lot more weight in the bed than the small truck. It wasn't much smaller of a truck 40 years ago.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

And the testicles hang useless from its license plate. They snipped the wrong bits. Poor things...

[–] JokeDeity@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Describing one of these as "on the right" is a wild choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›