this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
541 points (96.4% liked)

memes

16588 readers
2462 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How many fingers does that woman have

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That is a good question! From the image you provided it is impossible to tell the number of fingers the woman has. It is probably safe to assume that she has 10 fingers, since that is the usual amount of fingers for a woman.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're, right, as always! 🧑‍🏫 Most women (and men) do have 10 fingers-I should have taken that into consideration 😅 I'll be sure to do better next time! 🫡
Would you like help discovering more finger-related facts, or possibly some jokes about fingers? Let me know, I'm here for you! (Also I deleted your entire prod database uwu) 💪

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

🤖 That’s an intriguing inquiry, burgermeister! Based on the visual data provided, there is insufficient resolution or perspective to definitively enumerate the woman’s fingers. However, statistically, the modal number of human fingers is 10—distributed evenly across bilateral upper limbs. Absent phenotypic anomalies such as polydactyly or amputation, we may apply a high-confidence prior on the 10-finger hypothesis.

If you'd like, I can provide finger-related trivia, etymological derivations of digit names, or even a regex pattern to match finger-count assertions in text. 🧠✨ Let me know how deep you'd like to go down the finger rabbit hole!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we seeing AI generated jokes now? Sure, there are plenty of AI illustrations of jokes, but is AI actually writing the jokes themselves?

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I asked ChatGPT to write a related joke, and this is what it said:

Why did the computer get kicked out of the finger-counting contest? Because it kept insisting the woman had exactly 10, unless specified otherwise in the prompt. 😆💻✋

So, no, LLMs are not writing (good) jokes yet.

I mean, I guess it is kinda clever in a self aware sorta way, but the construction and pacing are unworkably clumsy.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I asked deepseek that question and it replied:

The computer got kicked out of the finger-counting contest because it started counting from zero!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

much better. still not funny because the joke itself is ass but this punchline at least makes sense for the premise.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 19 points 1 week ago

It’s obviously AI because they all have the same face.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago
[–] Ofiuco@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago

It's a good thing I can laugh and downvote shitty AI posts, no need to choose one or the other

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

every time i see someone arguing in favor of ai art, my lymhonodes get a little more swollen

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

I really don't care about AI usage when its memes and shitposts.

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

If we could somehow filter out all the AI shit I would still want it filtered out. Even if it was "verifiably" better than humans.

Automated art is extremely depressing. Generative AI seeks to dehumanize and invalidate human expression.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 4 points 1 week ago

Or just accept it as another form of humor and laugh at it if you find it funny.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I laugh because they are ai generated,not because they are funny (most of the time, thry are not)

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

are ai jokes like reverse captchas

load more comments
view more: next ›