Programming Circlejerk

230 readers

1 users here now

Community to talk about enlightened programming takes

Rules:

read and follow the programming.dev code of conduct
no flamewars
mark your unjerks
only programming related content allowed
link to the original source
do not mention this community in places like hackernews, lobste.rs, or the general programming communities on Lemmy where we source jerk material from.

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

FirstMajesticComet@programming.dev

crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz

crmsnbleyd@programming.dev

316

have you tried this other much smarter goat (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 week ago by crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz to c/programmingcirclejerk@programming.dev

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's just baaaaa-d practice

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah you have to approach SQL in prod sheepishly and maybe wrap in a BEGIN TRAN ROLLBACK TRAN.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Next month's goat will fix all the problems!

[–] ISO@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

But a goat is the greatest by definition.
There can't exist a "my goat is goater than your goat" situation, logically.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they trying to say that it is dangerous to develop on production (true) or that it is stupid to use AI (doubtful)? This seems like a somewhat confused analogy.

[–] whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume it's a reference to the recent repl.it happenings

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Of course. I meant it's not clear what point they were trying to make about that.