this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
831 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

12291 readers
57 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like a good way to make use of old eMachines, at a large discount too.

Finally, the year of the Linux Desktop! (eMachine edition)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 159 points 1 week ago (7 children)

When quarantines hit and everyone was communicating via zoom, I offered to recycle people's computers and destroy their old hard drives for free. I'd remove and drill multiple holes through the hard drives, vacuum/dust the computer, install a small, inexpensive HDD, and install Ubuntu.

Then I'd install zoom and chrome (sorry) and then pair each computer with a wired mouse, keyboard, and webcam that I had laying around in bulk. Then I'd drop these computers off at shelters, elder communities, and religious institutions. Essentially, anywhere you'd find someone who didn't have the means to contact family, attend an interview, or whatever.

Recycling/upcycling old computers isn't just good for the environment and your investment, it's good for your community!

[–] StowawayFog@piefed.social 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You’re doing the lord’s work, fartographer

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Eh, I didn't have much else going on and playing Jackbox remotely with my family made me realize how much others were possibly missing out. I don't even know if or how those computers were used. I just had a lot of time on my hands and an urge to use my then-new drill. Then, I'd move the equipment out before my wife killed me and then let literally anyone else handle the logistics.

Prior to the pandemic, I'd take 20+ year-old laptops and other equipment to a friend's ranch and we'd shoot shit. One time, I peppered myself with glass from a CRT after shooting it from a few feet away with a 16 ga.

I'm not directed by charity, I'm just wildly impulsive and occasionally productive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then I'd install zoom and chrome (sorry)

You monster...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Chaotic good

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Ewww, Ubuntu? Honey, don't touch it. We're an Arch family."

-No one ever

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"We use Arch in this house, BTW"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Idk what year that pic was taken, but 2GB of ram is useless no matter what operating system you put on it.

Except ofc for a home nas, but as a desktop, the user is going to open Firefox, try to open a website, it will take minutes to load and the user just wasted $20

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

2GB of ram is useless no matter what operating system you put on it.

Ubuntu 16.04

This is an old photo

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

It's a poor spec for a phone, let alone a PC.

Sometimes it's best just to scrap it.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Libre Office 5.2 seems to have been released in August 2016.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

5 minutes ago I was gaming on my 2gb Windows XP machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

After reading that, I just checked my memory. After an hour and a half using FF and and a videoplayer (on a reasonably up-to-date Ubuntu 20.x-based XFCE system), I'm using 2.2GB (out of 16, fairly typical, with no swap). So I'm pretty sure that - depending as always on what software they've chosen - 2GB is far from 'useless'. As always, depends on the use case. That's plenty if you spend most days in a text editor coding.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2 gigs of ram is going to be incredibly rough in 2025. Linux is better on old hardware but those specs are pretty optimistic.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This image is at least 10 years old

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

It's at most 9 years old, as it mentions Ubuntu 16.4.

[–] achance4cheese@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was able to get Windows 11 to run on a 10 year old laptop through Proxmox. With 3 other Linux OSs running at the same time. With almost no issues. The Win11 system requirements are made up. It’s a way to sell more computers, that’s it. Line go up is all it is.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Still a very inefficient OS

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

Yes, but at the end of the day you're still running Windows.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is exactly how I got into Linux .

Had some... Life troubles.

Started over.

Needed computer.

Local community employment/outreach/social support place had a volunteer run computer place in the basement (they also had a bike place, and a cafe or two, and some apartments, and they were the best community org ever..).

100$

I bought 2 over a couple years.

I'm pretty sure they had xubuntu.

Over 10 years later I still have both. And I just put mint 23xfce on one and use it as my living room media player - dvi to HDMI projector.

I have no need for a lot of stuff. I make work what I can. And I keep it working as long as I can however I can.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

$20 is one hell of a price, considering how much time must have gone into this machine!

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That depends on their setup.

Taking donated PCs to save them from e-waste. Hooking it up to a large KVM and running hardware diags then a image script to load OS, software and quick check for drivers and functionality...

Maybe 15-30 min labor if you're efficient and doing them in bulk.

... Yeah still a good deal haha.

I used to do this kind of work. With a wall of monitors mounted and PCs below. It was pretty chill and just needed to poke one when needed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Love the “Installed and tested by Tim G.”

Hey bro you got Tim G. PC too?

Thanks Tim!

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

make use of old eMachines

eMachines was a brand of economical personal computers. In 2004, it was acquired by Gateway, Inc., which was in turn acquired by Acer Inc. in 2007. The eMachines brand was discontinued in 2013.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMachines

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (9 children)

That's probably okay if all you want to do is browse the web.

But with an Intel celeron you're not going to get very far even if you do have a more efficient operating system.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Well it is a $20 computer. I can imagine it serving as someone's introduction to Linux because "why not, it's cheap enough for an experiment".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ericatty 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My husband says eMachines have a pretty common capacitor problem. It's an easy fix to remove and replace for people who know how.

Before selling, the capacitors should be visually checked, at minimum, because they can leak and that's no good.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that’s most older electronics in some way shape or form, tho. i’d hope any reseller with space for shelves of product is doing a good look-over of everything they put up. or selling it with a disclaimer/nonguarantee.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

All capacitors fail but items from around the time e machines were selling have capacitor plague and are thus more likely to fail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The year of the Linux eDishwasher!

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know it’s an old photo but it’s funny to me how they describe the machine itself in very simple terms in a way that any person could probably understand with minimal technical knowledge (here’s the programs it has it works ok), and then there’s so much internet lingo and borderline tech speak for the reasons to opt for Linux instead of Windows lol. Could have started with “it’s faster!”

[–] beastlykings@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh you're right! I thought this was new. But, at least as old as 2017, at least from my search.

But yes, way too tech lingo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] msprout@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This may as well be porn to me.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is useless. It's not even high enough spec to run your Electron calculator in a sandboxed container.

/s

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm troubled that my older hardware is way less power efficient doing the same tasks.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The most environmentally friendly computer is the one you already have. No power savings is so great as to offset the environmental cost of manufacturing of a new machine, shipping it to you, and the environmental impact of putting the existing machine into landfill. Run it into the ground until it either physically breaks or is literally no longer capable of performing the tasks you need. It's not an environmental gain to upgrade JUST for power efficiency.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

runs great on older less powerful hardware

better hardware support, not having to hunt down drivers

I remember installing Linux on my old laptop. It took me half a day to find working drivers for my WiFi card. It's probably better now but whenever I read stuff like this I call bullshit.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

it's a lot better now to the point you don't even need to search for drivers. I can't even recall the last time I had to search for drivers on Linux, it just has them and some people have even made drivers for the most obscure things that not even windows supports anymore. Hell a couple months ago I found a driver someone made for something called a "Dex Drive" which was an old dongle for Playstation Memory cards.

Linux is 10x easier today. Even running windows programs is a hell of a lot easier and in many cases work the exact same way as on Windows. double click the exe, install it, you're good to go.

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

WiFi cards were an iconic problem many years ago.

Nowadays I almost never have issues with WiFi

[–] ewenak@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have had to do it one or two years ago for my previous installation, but that's because I was using Debian on a computer whose WiFi card does not have open source drivers. But in Ubuntu it worked out of the box, and I think it may work out of the box on Debian too now that they include non free firmware by default.

You only need to install special drivers manually if you use a distro that is a bit "advanced".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

i guess the eMachines truly were never obsolete

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I had an exact machine like this, with these specs, just with an internal Nvidia GPU and 4 extra video cards added. Using USB splitters and USB audio cards, we made that computer work for 5 users simultaneously.

Built software for initial setup (what USB mouse and KB goes with what monitor?) and it worked like a charm.

There was even enough ram available to run a single virtual box instance with Windows XP (I believe) for one single user.

The Linux desktop was skinned to look like Windows XP too and for class rooms we used... I forgot the name, some open source classroom management system where the teacher could guide students remotely

Linux is awesome

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Heroes don't all wear capes!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

What has kept me from trying Linux is my fear of not understanding what I'm doing all over again, and difficulty running all of my games. I've used Windows since the mid-90s and I'm very good/familiar with it. Diving headfirst into a new OS and feeling like an idiot again is not something I want, so I've been too afraid to make that jump. I also don't know whether or not the difficulty running games thing is overblown.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Linux Mint is often recommended to the uninitiated and you can test it without installing it, using a live USB image. Boot up of off the USB drive, test it, turn it off, pop out the drive, tun it back on, you're back to your old OS.

Whatever the linux flavor, the graphical part will most likely be called GNOME or KDE. They're very user-friendly, you just need to explore a bit with your mouse.

Games have improved tremendously thanks to Valve and you can play most of them on linux via compatibility layers.

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Games are now incredibly easy to run on Linux thanks to Proton. I haven't tested my entire back catalog but I've yet to encounter an actual problem that required a fix since I switched to Linux for good earlier this year.

Anecdotal, but I remember the difficulty of running games as the reason I never fully committed in the past. I'll never touch Windows again. I see the learning curve as a positive. I'm always excited to dive deeper into Linux.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›