this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7148 readers
418 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
29
How a California cloud-seeding company became the center of a Texas flood conspiracy (www.latimes.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Best-case-scenario estimates — absolute best-case — are that these cloud-seeding operations are able to augment the amount of precipitation by at most 10% to 15% over very limited areas,” Swain said. “On average, it’s a lot lower than that. In fact, in some cases, it’s difficult to prove that cloud seeding does anything at all.”

Indeed, Andrew Dessler, a professor of atmospheric sciences at Texas A&M University, has gone so far as to call cloud seeding a scam — in part because it can prey on farmers and other people who are desperate for rain, and because it typically delivers only modest results, he said.

“There’s no physical way that cloud seeding could have made the Texas storm,” Dessler said, noting that the storm was fueled by extremely high levels of atmospheric water that stemmed from a tropical disturbance in the Gulf of Mexico. “This is a nonsense argument. There’s no debate here about whether cloud seeding played a role in this

Archived copies of the article

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

During the Dust Bowl charlatans used to collect money from towns and farmers to take a plane up and drop dynamite out of it at height, with the logic that the explosion would somehow shock the water out of the air and make it rain. It had no real effect on rain frequency or intensity.

The more things change the more they stay the same.

The conspiracy is stupid as shit, and I would bet money it’s from some idiot who has either been brainwashed my Fox News into believing California is the cause of all America’s problems, or someone who benefits from selling that story.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Everything but accept that they were wrong about climate change.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Morans.