this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Science

5059 readers
167 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

😆

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think once you win a Nobel, it's okay to rest on your laurels.

[–] CamilleMellom@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Also you don’t usually get a Nobel at the beginning of your career?

[–] FlyingSquid@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I just did some Googling and apparently, that is a more recent development (at least for physics, medicine and chemistry). Science Nobel laureates used to be young, or at least much younger, but now they are skewing much older. This article discusses it: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-37578899

[–] CamilleMellom@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

True! My gf is a chemist and said that there used to be that saying that if you hadn’t had your Nobel by 35 then you failed :S

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

These days the committee prefers to wait until a body of work has made an impact across society. This typically takes a few decades. I actually prefer this style, although it is too often the case that the authors have since died. Would be good to see them allow posthumous awards within reason.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

In this article they say they controlled for researcher age. How effective that control is I cannot say.

load more comments
view more: next ›