this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
84 points (90.4% liked)

movies

3349 readers
457 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We asked The Atlantic’s writers and editors: What’s a film adaptation that’s better than the book?

The article explains why they consider the movies Jurassic Park, The Talented Mr. Ripley, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, The Devil Wears Prada, The Social Network, and Clear and Present Danger each to be better than their source material.

(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

V for Vendetta.

The original graphic novel is good, but very dated to the feel of the Thatcher years.

The film has aged a lot better and it smoothed out the pacing, making it much more enjoyable IMO.

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I agree. I read the comics after the movie and while I enjoyed them, imo the movie was better.

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

What Dreams May Come. I love the movie. Could barely make it through the book.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How is Lord of the rings not on this list?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The film makes substantial changes to the ending and some of the main plot though. The novel makes no mention of credit card companies, and the film ending is an atrocity.

Edit: this was supposed to be for the comment thread about Fight Club but apparently posted independently. Apologies for the confusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›