this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

2664 readers
260 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

As someone who has been working on a project involving a network (directed graph) with nodes that need references on both sides, I do agree with many points in the article. And yeah the burrow checker isn't perfect, as someone who came from C I do get to points where the logic is fine, but burrow checker doesn't get it and I'm like "C would let me just do it".

But I think I don't agree with the parts about it not getting better. Author said he's using it intermittently for a few years, I also have been using it for last few years and now I just write things the way rust expects it. And I think it has helped me not worry about a lot of runtime bugs. I just worry about the logical bugs and that's about it.

Not perfect, but I think it's pretty good. Also if you really want to force rust to do things, sometimes a little unsafe rust gets you there.