this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
5 points (69.2% liked)

Public Health

1000 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The epidemic of diabetes is recent. So why would ancient remedies be effective?

Also - Cholesterol is not actually a disease, damage cholesterol is. Elevated cholesterol does not infer cardiovascular risk unless it's damaged

In one study, bitter melon extract significantly lowered fasting blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes after four weeks.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.12.045

Bitter melon had a modest hypoglycemic effect and significantly reduced fructosamine levels from baseline among patients with type 2 diabetes who received 2000 mg/day. However, the hypoglycemic effect of bitter melon was less than metformin 1000 mg/day.

It's curious, to be sure, but if someone is fighting t2d they are better advised to remove glucose from their food Rather than eating a lot of glucose and using bitter melon to try to reduce it in the blood.